A Non-linear Optimal Control Design using Narrowband Perturbation Feedback for Magnetostrictive Actuators

被引:12
作者
Oates, William S. [1 ]
Zrostlik, Rick [2 ]
Eichhorn, Scott [2 ]
Smith, Ralph [3 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] ETREMA Prod Inc, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[3] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Math, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
magnetostrictive; narrowband control; hysteresis; non-linear optimal control; PREDICTIVE CONTROL; HYSTERESIS; COMPENSATION; CREEP;
D O I
10.1177/1045389X10386398
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Non-linear optimal and narrowband feedback control designs are developed and experimentally implemented on a magnetostrictive Terfenol-D actuator. The non-linear optimal control design incorporates a non-linear and hysteretic ferromagnetic homogenized energy model within an optimal control formulation to reduce displacement tracking errors and increase bandwidth. Improvements in robustness in the steady-state regime are achieved by utilizing narrowband feedback. A narrowband filter is implemented by treating the non-linear and hysteretic magnetostrictive constitutive behavior as higher-order harmonic disturbances which are mitigated by tuning the narrowband filter to penalize these harmonics for displacement tracking control problems. The control designs are then combined into a hybrid optimal controller with perturbation narrowband feedback. Both transient and steady-state tracking control is assessed to illustrate performance attributes in different operating regimes. Narrowband perturbation feedback is shown to mitigate errors in the steady-state operating regime, while non-linear optimal control provides enhanced tracking control in the transient regime. The hybrid control design is relevant to a broad number of smart material actuators that exhibit non-linear and hysteretic field-coupled constitutive behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1681 / 1693
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Approximate inversion of the Preisach hysteresis operator with application to control of smart actuators [J].
Iyer, RV ;
Tan, XB ;
Krishnaprasad, PS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2005, 50 (06) :798-810
[12]   Real-time compensation of hysteresis and creep in piezoelectric actuators [J].
Janocha, H ;
Kuhnen, K .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2000, 79 (02) :83-89
[13]   OPTIMIZATION BY SIMULATED ANNEALING [J].
KIRKPATRICK, S ;
GELATT, CD ;
VECCHI, MP .
SCIENCE, 1983, 220 (4598) :671-680
[14]  
Lewis F., 1995, Optimal control
[15]  
Lovera M, 2003, P AMER CONTR CONF, P999
[16]  
Mracek CP, 1998, INT J ROBUST NONLIN, V8, P401, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1239(19980415/30)8:4/5<401::AID-RNC361>3.0.CO
[17]  
2-U
[18]  
Natale C, 2001, IEEE ASME INT C ADV, P744, DOI 10.1109/AIM.2001.936759
[19]   Experimental Implementation of a Hybrid Nonlinear Control Design for Magnetostrictive Actuators [J].
Oates, William S. ;
Evans, Phillip G. ;
Smith, Ralph C. ;
Dapino, Marcelo J. .
JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2009, 131 (04) :1-11
[20]   Optimal Tracking Using Magnetostrictive Actuators Operating in Nonlinear and Hysteretic Regimes [J].
Oates, William S. ;
Smith, Ralph C. .
JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2009, 131 (03) :1-11