A Non-linear Optimal Control Design using Narrowband Perturbation Feedback for Magnetostrictive Actuators

被引:12
作者
Oates, William S. [1 ]
Zrostlik, Rick [2 ]
Eichhorn, Scott [2 ]
Smith, Ralph [3 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] ETREMA Prod Inc, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[3] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Math, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
magnetostrictive; narrowband control; hysteresis; non-linear optimal control; PREDICTIVE CONTROL; HYSTERESIS; COMPENSATION; CREEP;
D O I
10.1177/1045389X10386398
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Non-linear optimal and narrowband feedback control designs are developed and experimentally implemented on a magnetostrictive Terfenol-D actuator. The non-linear optimal control design incorporates a non-linear and hysteretic ferromagnetic homogenized energy model within an optimal control formulation to reduce displacement tracking errors and increase bandwidth. Improvements in robustness in the steady-state regime are achieved by utilizing narrowband feedback. A narrowband filter is implemented by treating the non-linear and hysteretic magnetostrictive constitutive behavior as higher-order harmonic disturbances which are mitigated by tuning the narrowband filter to penalize these harmonics for displacement tracking control problems. The control designs are then combined into a hybrid optimal controller with perturbation narrowband feedback. Both transient and steady-state tracking control is assessed to illustrate performance attributes in different operating regimes. Narrowband perturbation feedback is shown to mitigate errors in the steady-state operating regime, while non-linear optimal control provides enhanced tracking control in the transient regime. The hybrid control design is relevant to a broad number of smart material actuators that exhibit non-linear and hysteretic field-coupled constitutive behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1681 / 1693
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Robust Adaptive Control of Coupled Parallel Piezo-Flexural Nanopositioning Stages [J].
Bashash, Saeid ;
Jalili, Nader .
IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, 2009, 14 (01) :11-20
[2]  
Bay J.S., 1999, FUNDAMENTALS LINEAR
[3]  
Chess RX, 2006, NASATP2002006213460, P1
[4]   GENERALIZED PREDICTIVE CONTROL .1. THE BASIC ALGORITHM [J].
CLARKE, DW ;
MOHTADI, C ;
TUFFS, PS .
AUTOMATICA, 1987, 23 (02) :137-148
[5]   Creep, hysteresis, and vibration compensation for piezoactuators: Atomic force microscopy application [J].
Croft, D ;
Shed, G ;
Devasia, S .
JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (01) :35-43
[6]   Tracking control of a piezoceramic actuator [J].
Ge, P ;
Jouaneh, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 4 (03) :209-216
[7]   PERFORMANCE OF HIGHER HARMONIC CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR HELICOPTER VIBRATION REDUCTION [J].
HALL, SR ;
WERELEY, NM .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1993, 16 (04) :793-797
[8]   Nonlinear model predictive control: current status and future directions [J].
Henson, MA .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 23 (02) :187-202
[9]  
Ikhouane F., 2007, Systems With Hysteresis: Analysis, Identi- fication and Control Using the Bouc-Wen Model
[10]   Control of Hysteretic Systems Through inverse Compensation ALGORITHMS, ADAPTATION, AND EMBEDDED IMPLEMENTATION [J].
Iyer, Ram V. ;
Tan, Xiaobo .
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2009, 29 (01) :83-99