Clinical evaluation of deep learning-based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Ma, Chen-ying [1 ]
Zhou, Ju-ying [1 ]
Xu, Xiao-ting [1 ]
Qin, Song-bing [1 ]
Han, Miao-fei [2 ]
Cao, Xiao-huan [2 ]
Gao, Yao-zong [2 ]
Xu, Lu [2 ]
Zhou, Jing-jie [2 ]
Zhang, Wei [2 ]
Jia, Le-cheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiat Oncol, 188 Shizi St, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co Ltd, Jiading 201807, Peoples R China
[3] United Imaging Res Inst Innovat Med Equipment, Shenzhen 518045, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cervical cancer CTV; Deep learning; Auto-segmentation; Registration; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; IMAGE; VARIABILITY; DELINEATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-022-00851-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives Accurate contouring of the clinical target volume (CTV) is a key element of radiotherapy in cervical cancer. We validated a novel deep learning (DL)-based auto-segmentation algorithm for CTVs in cervical cancer called the three-channel adaptive auto-segmentation network (TCAS). Methods A total of 107 cases were collected and contoured by senior radiation oncologists (ROs). Each case consisted of the following: (1) contrast-enhanced CT scan for positioning, (2) the related CTV, (3) multiple plain CT scans during treatment and (4) the related CTV. After registration between (1) and (3) for the same patient, the aligned image and CTV were generated. Method 1 is rigid registration, method 2 is deformable registration, and the aligned CTV is seen as the result. Method 3 is rigid registration and TCAS, method 4 is deformable registration and TCAS, and the result is generated by a DL-based method. Results From the 107 cases, 15 pairs were selected as the test set. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of method 1 was 0.8155 +/- 0.0368; the DSC of method 2 was 0.8277 +/- 0.0315; the DSCs of method 3 and 4 were 0.8914 +/- 0.0294 and 0.8921 +/- 0.0231, respectively. The mean surface distance and Hausdorff distance of methods 3 and 4 were markedly better than those of method 1 and 2. Conclusions The TCAS achieved comparable accuracy to the manual delineation performed by senior ROs and was significantly better than direct registration.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical evaluation of deep learning for auto-segmentation of CT images in RT for lung cancer
    Johnston, N.
    De Rycke, J.
    Lievens, Y.
    Vanderstraeten, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1371 - S1372
  • [22] COMPARING DEEP LEARNING-BASED AUTO-SEGMENTATION OF ORGANS AT RISK AND CLINICAL TARGET VOLUMES TO EXPERT INTER-OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING
    Wong, Jordan
    Fong, Allan
    McVicar, Nevin
    Smith, Sally
    Wells, Derek
    Giambattista, Joshua
    Gondara, Lovedeep
    Kolbeck, Carter
    Giambattista, Jonathan
    Alexander, Abraham
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 139 : S54 - S54
  • [23] Comparing deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk and clinical target volumes to expert inter-observer variability in radiotherapy planning
    Wong, Jordan
    Fong, Allan
    McVicar, Nevin
    Smith, Sally
    Giambattista, Joshua
    Wells, Derek
    Kolbeck, Carter
    Giambattista, Jonathan
    Gondara, Lovedeep
    Alexander, Abraham
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 144 : 152 - 158
  • [24] Comparing Deep Learning-based Auto-segmentation of Organs at Risk and Clinical Target Volumes to Expert Inter-Observer Variability in Radiotherapy Planning
    Wong, J.
    Fong, A.
    McVicar, N.
    Smith, S. L.
    Giambattista, J. A.
    Wells, D. M.
    Lovedeep, G.
    Kolbeck, C.
    Giambattsita, J.
    Alexander, A. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : S70 - S71
  • [25] Developing Clinical Pipeline to Translate Deep Learning Based Auto-Segmentation Models for Radiotherapy Planning
    Lin, M.
    Bai, T.
    Wang, B.
    Nguyen, D.
    Gonzalez, Y.
    Wu, J.
    Yan, Y.
    Jia, X.
    Godley, A.
    Jiang, S.
    Lu, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E135 - E135
  • [26] Clinical evaluation of a deep learning CBCT auto-segmentation software for prostate adaptive radiation therapy
    Radici, Lorenzo
    Piva, Cristina
    Borca, Valeria Casanova
    Cante, Domenico
    Ferrario, Silvia
    Paolini, Marina
    Cabras, Laura
    Petrucci, Edoardo
    Franco, Pierfrancesco
    La Porta, Maria Rosa
    Pasquino, Massimo
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 47
  • [27] Clinical evaluation of a deep learning based auto-segmentation model for intracranial organs at risk
    Poel, Robert
    Ruefenacht, Elias
    Fix, Michael
    Scheib, Stefan
    Reyes, Mauricio
    Ermis, Ekin
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S821 - S822
  • [28] Evaluation of the Auto-Segmentation Based On Self-Registration and Atlas for Cervical Cancer in Adaptive and Replan Radiotherapy
    Zheng, Q.
    Zhang, J.
    Zhang, H.
    Wang, J.
    Gao, B.
    Wang, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E397 - E397
  • [29] Prior information guided auto-segmentation of clinical target volume of tumor bed in postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy
    Xin Xie
    Yuchun Song
    Feng Ye
    Shulian Wang
    Hui Yan
    Xinming Zhao
    Jianrong Dai
    Radiation Oncology, 18
  • [30] Prior information guided auto-segmentation of clinical target volume of tumor bed in postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy
    Xie, Xin
    Song, Yuchun
    Ye, Feng
    Wang, Shulian
    Yan, Hui
    Zhao, Xinming
    Dai, Jianrong
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)