The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: investigating the role of environmental turbulence

被引:418
作者
Wilden, Ralf [1 ]
Gudergan, Siegfried P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle Business Sch, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Marketing capabilities; Technological capabilities; Market sensing; Reconfiguring; Dynamic capability; Environmental turbulence; Partial least squares; FIMIX-PLS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; PRODUCT INNOVATION; MODERATING ROLE; PLS-SEM; FIRM; ORIENTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-014-0380-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Marketing and technological capabilities are primary drivers of a firm's performance and thus of central interest to managers. Yet the way in which these two capabilities align with changing environments to secure superior performance remains unclear. Drawing on the dynamic capability view and data from a survey of 228 firms, this study proposes a model of how frequent dynamic capability utilization, assessed through its underlying processes of sensing and reconfiguring, relates to marketing and technological capabilities, as well as how market, technological, and competitor turbulence might affect these relationships. The results show that frequent sensing and reconfiguring have stronger positive effects in environments characterized by high competitor turbulence; however, frequent sensing can have negative relationships with marketing and technological capabilities in stable environments. Furthermore, marketing capabilities are positively associated with firm performance in highly competitive environments, whereas technological capabilities enhance performance in stable competitive environments.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 199
页数:19
相关论文
共 141 条
[61]   COMPARISONS OF SELF-RATINGS AND SUPERIOR RATINGS OF MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE [J].
HENEMAN, HG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 59 (05) :638-642
[62]   Organizational culture and performance measurement systems [J].
Henri, JF .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2006, 31 (01) :77-103
[63]  
Henseler J, 2009, ADV INT MARKETING, V20, P277, DOI 10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
[64]   The performance impact of marketing resources [J].
Hooley, GJ ;
Greenley, GE ;
Cadogan, JW ;
Fahy, J .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (01) :18-27
[65]   Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance [J].
Jantunen A. ;
Puumalainen K. ;
Saarenketo S. ;
Kyläheiko K. .
Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2005, 3 (3) :223-243
[66]   A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research [J].
Jarvis, CB ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Podsakoff, PM .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (02) :199-218
[67]   MARKET ORIENTATION - ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES [J].
JAWORSKI, BJ ;
KOHLI, AK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1993, 57 (03) :53-70
[68]   MARKET ORIENTATION - THE CONSTRUCT, RESEARCH PROPOSITIONS, AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
KOHLI, AK ;
JAWORSKI, BJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (02) :1-18
[69]   How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence [J].
Kraatz, MS ;
Zajac, EJ .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (05) :632-657
[70]  
KUMAR N, 1993, ACAD MANAGE J, V36, P1633, DOI 10.5465/256824