Comparing Relaxation Versus Mastery Microbreak Activity: A Within-Task Recovery Perspective

被引:10
作者
Conlin, Amanda [1 ]
Hu, Xinyu [1 ]
Barber, Larissa K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northern Illinois Univ, Dept Psychol, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
Microbreak activity; recovery; psychological detachment; positive affect; performance; experiment; WORK-RELATED EFFORT; JOB DEMANDS; EXPERIENCES; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; RESOURCES; BREAK; INTERVENTIONS; BURNOUT; LEISURE;
D O I
10.1177/0033294119900347
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recovery from work is generally thought to occur outside of the workplace. However, employees may also have the opportunity to recover within the work day via microbreaks during demanding work tasks. Two major strategies for mitigating fatigue include psychological detachment (i.e., mentally disengaging) and replenishing motivational incentives via positive affect. This study examined whether 40-s "microbreaks" improve work recovery and to what extent different microbreak content (mastery vs. relaxation activities) boost performance. Using an experimental study, we randomly assigned individuals to receive a relaxation microbreak (n = 59), a mastery microbreak (n = 68), or no break (n = 72) in the middle of a monotonous work task and assessed work performance. Microbreaks improved task performance and within-task recovery, but only for psychological detachment (not positive affect). Mastery breaks also resulted in more psychological detachment than relaxation breaks, but this increased detachment did not explain performance differences between break types. These results build on existing recovery theories by further demonstrating within-task recovery and provide practical implications for organizations to consider the importance of microbreaks.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 265
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   The effectiveness of physical activity interventions in improving well-being across office-based workplace settings: a systematic review [J].
Abdin, S. ;
Welch, R. K. ;
Byron-Daniel, J. ;
Meyrick, J. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 160 :70-76
[2]  
AMMONS RB, 1959, PSYCHOL REP, V5, P654
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Coll Stud J
[4]  
Bakker A. B., 2007, Journal of Managerial Psychology, V22, P309, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115, 10.1108/02683940710733115]
[5]   An episodic process model of affective influences on performance [J].
Beal, DJ ;
Weiss, HM ;
Barros, E ;
MacDermid, SM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (06) :1054-1068
[6]   Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis [J].
Bennett, Andrew A. ;
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Field, James G. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2018, 39 (03) :262-275
[7]   Recovery during the weekend and fluctuations in weekly job performance: A week-level study examining intra-individual relationships [J].
Binnewies, Carmen ;
Sonnentag, Sabine ;
Mojza, Eva J. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 83 (02) :419-441
[8]   What makes for a good break? A diary study on recovery experiences during lunch break [J].
Bosch, Christine ;
Sonnentag, Sabine ;
Pinck, Anna Sophia .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 91 (01) :134-157
[9]   MEASURING EMOTION - THE SELF-ASSESSMENT MANNEQUIN AND THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL [J].
BRADLEY, MM ;
LANG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 25 (01) :49-59
[10]   ORIGINS AND FUNCTIONS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT - A CONTROL-PROCESS VIEW [J].
CARVER, CS ;
SCHEIER, MF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 97 (01) :19-35