Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for quantification of gentamicin and its individual congeners in serum and comparison results with two immunoanalytical methods (fluorescence polarization immunoassay and chemiluminiscent microparticle immunoassay)

被引:5
|
作者
Brozmanova, Hana [1 ,2 ]
Urinovska, Romana [1 ,2 ]
Safarcik, Kristian [3 ,4 ]
Vsiansky, Frantisek [3 ]
Kacirova, Ivana [1 ,2 ]
Grundmann, Milan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ostrava, Fac Med, Inst Clin Pharmacol, Syllabova 19, Ostrava 70300, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Dept Lab Med, 17 Listopadu 1790, Ostrava 70852, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Clin Biochem, Dept Lab Med, 17 Listopadu 1790, Ostrava 70852, Czech Republic
[4] Univ Ostrava, Fac Med, Dept Biomed Sci, Syllabova 19, Ostrava 70300, Czech Republic
关键词
Total gentamicin concentration; LC-MS/MS; Fluorescence polarization immunoassay; Chemiluminiscence microparticle immunoassay; Therapeutic drug monitoring; PLASMA; VANCOMYCIN; AMIKACIN; TISSUES; SAMPLES; URINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2021.07.014
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Total gentamicin is a sum of five congeners C1, C1a, C2, C2a and minor C2b, which differ from each other in their methylation on the purpurosamine ring. Liquid chromatography with mass detection (LC-MS/MS) and specified calibration material enables the concentration of total gentamicin and its individual congeners to be analysed. Methods: 50 mu L serum was precipitated with acetonitrile in the presence of 0.5 mol/L formic acid. A RP BEH C18 1.7 mu m 2.1x50 mm column maintained at 30 degrees C and tobramicin as the internal standard were used. Mass detection was performed in positive electrospray. The gentamicin results were compared with fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and chemiluminiscent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA). Passing-Bablock regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis were used. Results: Calibration curves for individual gentamicin congeners were linear with correlation coefficients between 0.997 and 0.998. Recovery was 91.6-102.0% and the coefficients of variation 1.4-8.4%. The total gentamicin concentration was compared with immunoassay FPIA (LC-MSgen = 0.9798xPFIA(gen)) and CMIA (LC MSgen = 0.9835xCMIA(gen)) both with significant correlation (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The LC-MS/MS method is fast and precise and can be applied to routine TDM in patients. Comparing it to immunoassays makes it possible to measure concentration of gentamicin congeners, which may be important in the case of their different pharmacokinetics.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a Methotrexate Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Comparison to Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
    Bouquie, Regis
    Gregoire, Matthieu
    Hernando, Helene
    Azoulay, Claudine
    Dailly, Eric
    Monteil-Ganiere, Catherine
    Pineau, Alain
    Deslandes, Guillaume
    Jolliet, Pascale
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 146 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [2] Comparison of Immunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods in the Measurement of Serum Androstenedione Levels
    Yucel, Kamile
    Abusoglu, Sedat
    Unlu, Ali
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2018, 64 (1-2) : 69 - 75
  • [3] Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Outperforms Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay in Monitoring Everolimus Therapy in Renal Transplantation
    Moes, Dirk Jan A. R.
    Press, Rogier R.
    de Fijter, Johan W.
    Guchelaar, Henk-Jan
    den Hartigh, Jan
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2010, 32 (04) : 413 - 419
  • [4] The quantification of sirolimus by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and microparticle enzyme immunoassay in renal transplant recipients
    Salm, P
    Taylor, PJ
    Pillans, PI
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2000, 22 : B71 - B85
  • [5] A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAs) in serum and plasma with comparison to an immunoassay method in a neonatal population
    Livie, Craig
    Lee, Louisa C. Y.
    Alimussina, Malika
    Conceicao, Carina
    Leung, Chui Ha
    McNeilly, Jane
    Ahmed, Syed Faisal
    Syme, Charlotte
    Smith, Karen
    Johnston, Susan
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2023, 1220
  • [6] Comparison of the Serum Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Using Chemiluminescent Immunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Children
    Wang, Jie
    Li, Xinliang
    Gan, Yongyi
    Fan, Tianxing
    Yang, Jing
    Rao, Fang
    Yang, Jianbo
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE AND VITAMINOLOGY, 2022, 68 (03) : 181 - 188
  • [7] Measurement of serum creatinine levels with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: comparison with Jaffe and enzymatic methods
    Yildirimel, Mehmet
    Atalar, Mehmet Nuri
    Abusoglu, Sedat
    Onmaz, Duygu Eryavuz
    Sivrikaya, Abdullah
    Abusoglu, Gulsum
    Unlu, Ali
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY-TURK BIYOKIMYA DERGISI, 2021, 46 (03): : 263 - 271
  • [8] Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for topiramate analysis in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid: Validation and comparison with fluorescence-polarization immunoassay
    Christensen, J
    Hojskov, CS
    Poulsen, JH
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2002, 24 (05) : 658 - 664
  • [9] Cloned enzyme donor immunoassay tacrolimus assay compared with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and microparticle enzyme immunoassay in liver and renal transplant recipients
    Westley, Ian S.
    Taylor, Paul J.
    Salm, Paul
    Morris, Raymond G.
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2007, 29 (05) : 584 - 591
  • [10] Head to head evaluation of the analytical performance of two commercial methotrexate immunoassays and comparison with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and the former fluorescence polarization immunoassay
    Gunther, Viola
    Mueller, Daniel
    von Eckardstein, Arnold
    Saleh, Lanja
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 54 (05) : 823 - 831