The development of a mandatory medical thesis in an urban medical school

被引:36
作者
Ogunyemi, D
Bazargan, M
Norris, K
Jones-Quaidoo, S
Wolf, K
Edelstein, R
Baker, RS
Calmes, D
机构
[1] Charles R Drew Univ Med & Sci, Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Otolaryngol, Med Sch Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Charles R Drew Univ Med & Sci, Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Family Med, Med Sch Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Charles R Drew Univ Med & Sci, Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ophthalmol, Med Sch Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Charles R Drew Univ Med & Sci, Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pediat, Med Sch Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15328015tlm1704_9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The objective of this study was to describe the development of a primary care medical student's thesis. Description: In 1995, as part of its primary care clerkship, the Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (Drew University), College of Medicine created a curriculum requiring medical students to develop, design, and implement a research project during their 2-year longitudinal clinical experience. For this study, we reviewed all student research projects generated between 1995 and 2004. Evaluation: Among the 112 research projects, topics covered included internal medicine (29.5%), obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN; 22%), psychosocial issues (20.5%), pediatrics (9%), public health/epidemiology (8%), medical education (8%), and surgery (3%). Mentors included faculty from internal medicine (16%), dean's office (16%), pediatrics (13%), family medicine (11%), non-Drew faculty (10%), OBGYN (9%), psychiatry (9%), surgery (9%), emergency medicine (4%), and pathology/radiology departments (3%). The students' survey showed that 83% agreed that the mentors were valuable, 72% admitted that their knowledge about the research process was improved, about 50% indicated that they were more competitive during residency application, and 80% claimed that they obtained satisfaction from accomplishing a goal. Conclusion: Students are able to conduct and present a primary care research project as a requirement of their medical training. Most students find the experience beneficial and positive.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 369
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   The German medical dissertation - Time to change? [J].
Diez, C ;
Arkenau, C ;
Meyer-Wentrup, F .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (08) :861-863
[2]  
Frishman W H, 2001, Heart Dis, V3, P140, DOI 10.1097/00132580-200105000-00002
[3]  
Gonzales A O, 1998, Fam Med, V30, P113
[4]   Teaching research methodology in medical schools: students' attitudes towards and knowledge about science [J].
Hren, D ;
Lukic, IK ;
Marusic, A ;
Vodopivec, I ;
Vujaklija, A ;
Hrabak, M ;
Marusic, M .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 38 (01) :81-86
[5]  
Institute of Medicine, 2002, GUID NAT HEALTHC DIS
[6]   Factors that influence doctors' participation in clinical research [J].
Lloyd, T ;
Phillips, BR ;
Aber, RC .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 38 (08) :848-851
[7]  
*LOS ANG COUNT DEP, DISTR PROF 2000 2001
[8]   Medical student attitudes toward inclusion of a research year within diagnostic radiology residency: A survey of students participating in the 2002 NRMP match [J].
Pretorius, ES ;
Solomon, JA ;
Stribling, C .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (01) :77-82
[9]   Medical student research: A residency director's perspective [J].
Pretorius, ES .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (07) :808-809
[10]   Publication pattern of medical theses, France, 1993-98 [J].
Salmi, LR ;
Gana, S ;
Mouillet, E .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2001, 35 (01) :18-21