Multi-criteria Applications in Renewable Energy Analysis: A Literature Review

被引:0
作者
Abu-Taha, Rimal
机构
来源
2011 PROCEEDINGS OF PICMET 11: TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT IN THE ENERGY-SMART WORLD (PICMET) | 2011年
关键词
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION-MAKING; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; POWER-PLANTS; SELECTION; AID; TECHNOLOGY; HYDROGEN; SUPPORT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Renewable energies are rising as solutions for a sustainable, environmentally friendly and long-term cost effective sources of energies for the future. Renewable energy decision making can be viewed as a multiple criteria decision-making problem with correlating criteria and alternatives. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDM) offer a flexible tool that is able to handle and bring together a wide range of variables and thus offer useful assistance to the decision maker in mapping out the situation. MCDM methods can be divided into two categories, multi-objective decision making (MODM) and multi-attribute decision making (MADM). A review of 90+ published papers of MCDM analysis in the renewable energy field is presented in this paper. Classification of both application area as well as methodology used are summarized. Analysis reveals that AHP is the most used of all MCDM methodologies.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [21] Sensitivity analysis of technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the analytic hierarchy process
    Chatzimouratidis, Athanasios I.
    Pilavachi, Petros A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (03) : 788 - 798
  • [22] Analytic network process applied to project selection
    Cheng, EWL
    Li, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 131 (04) : 459 - 466
  • [23] Energy supply for sustainable rural livelihoods. A multi-criteria decision-support system
    Cherni, Judith A.
    Dyner, Isaac
    Henao, Felipe
    Jaramillo, Patricia
    Smith, Ricardo
    Font, Raul Olalde
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) : 1493 - 1504
  • [24] Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis
    Chu, Mei-Tai
    Shyu, Joseph
    Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
    Khosla, Rajiv
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2007, 33 (04) : 1011 - 1024
  • [25] Climaco J., 1997, MULTICRITERIA ANAL
  • [26] Technology assessment for clean energy technologies: The case of the Pacific Northwest
    Daim, Tugrul
    Yates, Diane
    Peng, Yicheng
    Jimenez, Bertha
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2009, 31 (03) : 232 - 243
  • [27] A multi-objective decision model for the improvement of energy efficiency in buildings
    Diakaki, Christina
    Grigoroudis, Evangelos
    Kabelis, Nikos
    Kolokotsa, Dionyssia
    Kalaitzakis, Kostas
    Stavrakakis, George
    [J]. ENERGY, 2010, 35 (12) : 5483 - 5496
  • [28] Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece
    Diakoulaki, D.
    Karangelis, F.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2007, 11 (04) : 716 - 727
  • [29] The use of a preference disaggregation method in energy analysis and policy making
    Diakoulaki, D
    Zopounidis, C
    Mavrotas, G
    Doumpos, M
    [J]. ENERGY, 1999, 24 (02) : 157 - 166
  • [30] Policy instruments fostering wind energy projects - a multi-perspective evaluation approach
    Enzensberger, N
    Wietschel, M
    Rentz, O
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (09) : 793 - 801