Climate sensitivity, agricultural productivity and the social cost of carbon in FUND

被引:6
作者
Dayaratna, Kevin D. [1 ]
McKitrick, Ross [2 ]
Michaels, Patrick J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Heritage Fdn, Washington, DC 20002 USA
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Econ & Finance, Guelph, ON, Canada
[3] Competit Enterprise Inst, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Agriculture; Climate sensitivity; CO2; fertilization; Integrated assessment modeling; Social cost of carbon; OCEAN HEAT UPTAKE; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; CO2; ENRICHMENT; IMPACT; POLICY; TEMPERATURES; CONSTRAINTS; RESPONSES; MODELS; FACE;
D O I
10.1007/s10018-020-00263-w
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We explore the implications of recent empirical findings about CO2 fertilization and climate sensitivity on the social cost of carbon (SCC) in the FUND model. New compilations of satellite and experimental evidence suggest larger agricultural productivity gains due to CO2 growth are being experienced than are reflected in FUND parameterization. We also discuss recent studies applying empirical constraints to the probability distribution of equilibrium climate sensitivity and we argue that previous Monte Carlo analyses in IAMs have not adequately reflected the findings of this literature. Updating the distributions of these parameters under varying discount rates is influential on SCC estimates. The lower bound of the social cost of carbon is likely negative and the upper bound is much lower than previously claimed, at least through the mid-twenty-first century. Also the choice of discount rate becomes much less important under the updated parameter distributions.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 448
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bayesian estimation of climate sensitivity based on a simple climate model fitted to observations of hemispheric temperatures and global ocean heat content
    Aldrin, Magne
    Holden, Marit
    Guttorp, Peter
    Skeie, Ragnhild Bieltvedt
    Myhre, Gunnar
    Berntsen, Terje Koren
    [J]. ENVIRONMETRICS, 2012, 23 (03) : 253 - 271
  • [2] Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models
    Andrews, Timothy
    Gregory, Jonathan M.
    Webb, Mark J.
    Taylor, Karl E.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 39
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1996, GLOBAL TRADE ANAL MO, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174688.012
  • [4] The uncertainty about the social cost of carbon: A decomposition analysis using fund
    Anthoff, David
    Tol, Richard S. J.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 117 (03) : 515 - 530
  • [5] How sensitive is Nordhaus to Weitzman? Climate policy in DICE with an alternative damage function
    Botzen, W. J. Wouter
    van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M.
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 117 (01) : 372 - 374
  • [6] Peculiarly pleasant weather for US maize
    Butler, Ethan E.
    Mueller, Nathaniel D.
    Huybers, Peter
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (47) : 11935 - 11940
  • [7] The Social Cost of Carbon with Economic and Climate Risks
    Cai, Yongyang
    Lontzek, Thomas S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 127 (06) : 2684 - 2734
  • [8] Challinor AJ, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P287, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2153, 10.1038/nclimate2153]
  • [9] Satellite bulk tropospheric temperatures as a metric for climate sensitivity
    Christy, John R.
    McNider, Richard T.
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2017, 53 (04) : 511 - 518
  • [10] Response of wild C4 crop progenitors to subambient CO2 highlights a possible role in the origin of agriculture
    Cunniff, Jennifer
    Osborne, Colin P.
    Ripley, Brad S.
    Charles, Michael
    Jones, Glynis
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2008, 14 (03) : 576 - 587