Implementation and operation of incident learning across a newly-created health system

被引:5
作者
Schubert, Leah [1 ]
Petit, Josh [2 ]
Vinogradskiy, Yevgeniy [1 ]
Peters, Rick [2 ]
Towery, Jack [3 ]
Stump, Bryan [2 ]
Westerly, David [1 ]
Ridings, Jane [1 ,3 ]
Kneeland, Patrick [4 ]
Liu, Arthur [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Poudre Valley Hosp, Ft Collins, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Hlth Mem Hosp, Colorado Springs, CO 80907 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Med, Hosp Med Sect,Div Gen Internal Med, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
incident learning system; quality improvement; safety; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; REPORTING SYSTEM; EXPERIENCE; CULTURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12447
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this work is to describe our experience launching an expanded incident learning system for patient safety and quality that takes into account aspects beyond therapeutic dose delivery, specifically imaging/simulation incidents, medical care incidents, and operational issues. Methods Our ILS was designed for a newly created health system comprised of a midsized academic hospital and two smaller community hospitals. The main design goal was to create a highly sensitive system to capture as much information throughout the department as possible. Reports were classified according to incidents and near misses involving therapeutic radiation, imaging/simulation, and patient care (not involving radiation), unsafe conditions, operational issues, and accolades/suggestions. Reports were analyzed according to impact on various steps in the process of care. Actions made in response to reports were assessed and characterized by intervention reliability. Results A total of 1125 reports were submitted in the first 23 months. For all three departments, therapeutic radiation incidents and near misses consisted of less than one-third of all reports submitted. For the midsized academic department, operational issues and unsafe conditions comprised the largest percentage of reports (70%). Although the majority of reports impacted steps related to the technical aspects of treatment (simulation, planning, and treatment delivery), 20% impacted other steps such as scheduling or clinic visits. More than 160 actions were performed in response to reports. Of these actions, 63 were quality improvement interventions to improve practices, while 97 were learning actions for raising awareness. Conclusions We have developed an ILS that identifies issues related to the entire process of care delivery in radiation oncology, as evidenced by frequent and varied reported events. By identifying a broad spectrum of issues in a department, opportunities for improvement can be identified.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 305
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
American Society for Radiation Oncology, 2012, SAF IS ACC FRAM QUAL
[2]  
ASTRO, 2016, RAD ONC INC LEARN SY
[3]   Trend analysis of radiation therapy incidents over seven years [J].
Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre ;
Medlam, Gaylene .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 (01) :139-144
[4]   Patient safety improvements in radiation treatment through 5 years of incident learning [J].
Clark, Brenda G. ;
Brown, Robert J. ;
Ploquin, Jodi ;
Dunscombe, Peter .
PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 3 (03) :157-163
[5]   Consensus recommendations for incident learning database structures in radiation oncology [J].
Ford, E. C. ;
de Los Santos, L. Fong ;
Pawlicki, T. ;
Sutlief, S. ;
Dunscombe, P. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (12) :7272-7290
[6]   RO-ILS: Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System: A report from the first year of experience [J].
Hoopes, David J. ;
Dicker, Adam P. ;
Eads, Nadine L. ;
Ezzell, Gary A. ;
Fraass, Benedick A. ;
Kwiatkowski, Theresa M. ;
Lash, Kathy ;
Patton, Gregory A. ;
Piotrowski, Tom ;
Tomlinson, Cindy ;
Ford, Eric C. .
PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5 (05) :312-318
[7]   The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management [J].
Huq, M. Saiful ;
Fraass, Benedick A. ;
Dunscombe, Peter B. ;
Gibbons, John P., Jr. ;
Ibbott, Geoffrey S. ;
Mundt, Arno J. ;
Mutic, Sasa ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Rath, Frank ;
Thomadsen, Bruce R. ;
Williamson, Jeffrey F. ;
Yorke, Ellen D. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (07) :4209-4262
[8]  
Joint Commission, 2015, HUM FACT AN PAT SAF
[9]   A Comprehensive Quality Assurance Program for Personnel and Procedures in Radiation Oncology: Value of Voluntary Error Reporting and Checklists [J].
Kalapurakal, John A. ;
Zafirovski, Aleksandar ;
Smith, Jeffery ;
Fisher, Paul ;
Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam ;
Barnard, Cynthia ;
Rademaker, Alfred W. ;
Rave, Nick ;
Mittal, Bharat B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 86 (02) :241-248
[10]   Are we making an impact with incident learning systems? Analysis of quality improvement interventions using total body irradiation as a model system [J].
Kim, Aileen ;
Ford, Eric ;
Spraker, Matthew ;
Zeng, Jing ;
Ermoian, Ralph ;
Jordan, Loucille ;
Kane, Gabrielle ;
Nyflot, Matthew .
PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 7 (06) :418-424