Care: A Critical Review of Theory, Policy and Practice

被引:73
作者
Rummery, Kirstein [1 ]
Fine, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Sch Appl Social Sci, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
Care; Feminist theory; Disability rights; Long-term care; Carers; Older people; LONG-TERM-CARE; CASH-FOR-CARE; ELDERLY-PEOPLE; COMMUNITY CARE; DISABILITY; CITIZENSHIP; GENDER; PERSONALIZATION; INDEPENDENCE; REGIMES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00845.x
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Care is a source of critical tension in current social theory, and the policy and practice implications of that tension are evidenced in its current prominence on the political agenda of developed welfare states. This article critically appraises current developments in the theory, policy and practice of care, drawing on interdisciplinary developments in political theory, sociology and social policy. Developing feminist and disability-rights theories, it explores a critical synthesis of conflicting normative and theoretical positions regarding the giving and receiving of care, and of the ethics and justice of care. It examines case studies of current comparative policy developments across a range of different welfare regimes, including the marketization/commodification and de/re-familiaization of care, exploring ideological and normative trends in the design of contemporary policies. It discusses the impact of theory and policy on the practice of care, looking particularly at the issue of long-term care for disabled and older adults. Finally, the authors argue for the development of a citizenship-based approach to care that decouples it from individualistic and paternalistic paradigms that disempower those who give and receive care.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 343
页数:23
相关论文
共 126 条
[91]   Restructuring the welfare state: reforms in long-term care in Western European countries [J].
Pavolini, Emmanuele ;
Ranci, Costanzo .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2008, 18 (03) :246-259
[92]  
PfauEffinger B, 2011, WORK WEL EUR, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230307612
[93]  
Ramesh R., 2011, GUARDIAN 0817
[94]  
RINGEN S., 1987, POSSIBILITY POLITICS
[95]  
Rostgaard Tine., 2002, POLICY STUD-UK, V23, P51
[96]  
Rubery J, 1998, FEM ECON, V4, P71
[97]  
Rummery K., 2002, DISABILITY CITIZENSH
[98]   A Comparative Analysis of Personalisation: Balancing an Ethic of Care with User Empowerment [J].
Rummery, Kirstein .
ETHICS & SOCIAL WELFARE, 2011, 5 (02) :138-152
[99]   A Comparative Discussion of the Gendered Implications of Cash-for-Care Schemes: Markets, Independence and Social Citizenship in Crisis? [J].
Rummery, Kirstein .
SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 43 (06) :634-648
[100]  
Schiappa E., 1998, CONSTRUCTING REALITY