Comparison of a digital and an optical analogue hand-held refractometer for the measurement of canine urine specific gravity

被引:11
作者
Paris, J. K. [1 ,2 ]
Bennett, A. D. [3 ]
Dodkin, S. J. [4 ]
Gunn-Moore, D. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Easter Bush Vet Ctr, Royal Dick Sch Vet Studies, Roslin EH25 9RG, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Easter Bush Vet Ctr, Roslin Inst, Div Clin Vet Sci, Roslin EH25 9RG, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Raleigh, NC USA
[4] Langford Vet Serv, Biochem Lab, Langford BS40 5DU, N Somerset, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/vr.100348
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Urine specific gravity (USG) is used clinically as a measure of urine concentration, and is routinely assessed by refractometry. A comparison between optical analogue and digital refractometers for evaluation of canine urine has not been reported. The aim of this study was to compare a digital and an optical analogue hand-held refractometer for the measurement of canine USG, and to assess correlation with urine osmolality. Prospective study. Free-catch urine samples were collected from 285 hospitalised adult dogs, and paired USG readings were obtained with a digital and an optical analogue refractometer. In 50 dogs, urine osmolality was also measured using a freezing point depression osmometer. There was a small but statistically significant difference between the two refractometers (P<0.001), with the optical analogue refractometer reading higher than the digital refractometer (mean difference 0.0006, sd 0.0012). Paired refractometer measurements varied by <0.002 in 91.5 per cent of cases. The optical analogue and digital refractometer readings showed excellent correlation with osmolality (r=0.980 and r=0.977, respectively, P<0.001 in both cases). Despite statistical significance, the difference between the two refractometers is unlikely to be clinically significant. Both instruments provide an accurate assessment of USG in dogs.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / U65
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Comparison of digital and optical hand-held refractometers for the measurement of feline urine specific gravity
    Bennett, Alexander D.
    McKnight, Grace E.
    Dodkin, Steve J.
    Simpson, Kerry E.
    Schwartz, Anita M.
    Gunn-Moore, Danielle A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2011, 13 (02) : 152 - 154
  • [3] Measurement of urinary concentration: a critical appraisal of methodologies
    Chadha, V
    Garg, U
    Alon, US
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2001, 16 (04) : 374 - 382
  • [4] DIBARTOLA S. P, 2010, TXB VET INTERNAL MED, VVII, P1960
  • [5] DORIZZI R, 1987, CLIN CHEM, V33, P190
  • [6] Comparison of the techniques of evaluation of urine dilution/concentration in the dog
    Dossin, O
    Germain, C
    Braun, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES A-PHYSIOLOGY PATHOLOGY CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2003, 50 (06): : 322 - 325
  • [7] The usefulness and limitations of hand-held refractometers in veterinary laboratory medicine: An historical and technical review
    George, JW
    [J]. VETERINARY CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2001, 30 (04) : 201 - 210
  • [8] CORRELATION OF SPECIFIC-GRAVITY AND OSMOLALITY OF URINE IN NEONATES AND ADULTS
    LEECH, S
    PENNEY, MD
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1987, 62 (07) : 671 - 673
  • [9] Early diagnosis of renal disease and renal failure
    Lees, GE
    [J]. VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2004, 34 (04) : 867 - +
  • [10] LUNN K. F., 2009, KIRKS CURRENT VET TH, VXIV, P848