The impact of price and revenue floors on carbon emission reduction investment by coal-fired power plants

被引:30
作者
Zhang, Xinhua [1 ]
Gan, Dongmei [1 ]
Wang, Yali [1 ]
Liu, Yu [2 ,3 ]
Ge, Jiali [4 ]
Xie, Rui [5 ]
机构
[1] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Changsha 410114, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[5] Hunan Univ, Sch Econ & Trade, Changsha 410079, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon price floor; Revenue floor; Real option; Carbon emission reduction investment; Power market; STORAGE CCS INVESTMENT; REAL OPTION; CAPTURE; TECHNOLOGY; GENERATION; VALUATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119961
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we explore and compare the carbon emission rights price (carbon price) floor and revenue floor support schemes' incentive effects on coal-fired power plants' carbon emission reduction investment, considering random fluctuations of on-grid electricity volume and carbon price. First, we present real option models of carbon emission reduction investment under the carbon price floor and revenue floor schemes. Then, we discuss the optimal implementation duration of these two schemes. Results show the following: (1) both the carbon price floor and revenue floor support schemes can incentivize coal-fired power plants to invest in carbon emission reduction; however, there is a critical initial carbon price (CICP). Only if the initial carbon price is higher than the critical value can the carbon price floor or revenue floor encourage coal-fired power plants to immediately invest in carbon emission reduction. (2) Compared with the carbon price floor, the revenue floor requires a higher CICP but relatively fewer floor subsidies. If the initial carbon price is lower than the CICP and the carbon reduction facilities' operating costs are subsidized to ensure coal-fired power plants make the investment immediately, more subsidies are needed for the revenue floor policy than for the carbon price floor policy.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments [J].
Abadie, Luis M. ;
Chamorro, Jose M. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (06) :2992-3015
[2]   Inducing low-carbon investment in the electric power industry through a price floor for emissions trading [J].
Brauneis, Alexander ;
Mestel, Roland ;
Palan, Stefan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 53 :190-204
[3]   Cap prices or cap revenues? The dilemma of electric utility networks [J].
Campbell, Alrick .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 74 :802-812
[4]   Strategic real option and flexibility analysis for nuclear power plants considering uncertainty in electricity demand and public acceptance [J].
Cardin, Michel-Alexandre ;
Zhang, Sizhe ;
Nuttall, William J. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 64 :226-237
[5]   Quantifying the net cost of a carbon price floor in Germany [J].
Egli, Philipp ;
Lecuyer, Oskar .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 109 :685-693
[6]  
Huisman KJM, 2013, ST PROB OPT, V5, P20, DOI 10.3233/978-1-61499-238-7-20
[7]   Mitigating risks in wastewater treatment plant PPPs using minimum revenue guarantee and real options [J].
Marzouk, Mohamed ;
Ali, Mohamed .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2018, 53 :121-+
[8]   The impact of Chinese carbon emission trading scheme (ETS) on low carbon energy (LCE) investment [J].
Mo, Jian-Lei ;
Agnolucci, Paolo ;
Jiang, Mao-Rong ;
Fan, Ying .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 89 :271-283
[9]   USING FLOOR PRICE MECHANISMS TO PROMOTE CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (CCS) INVESTMENT AND CO2 ABATEMENT [J].
Mo, Jian-Lei ;
Zhu, Lei .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 25 (3-4) :687-707
[10]   Timing of investment under technological and revenue-related uncertainties [J].
Murto, Paull .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2007, 31 (05) :1473-1497