US Army Physical Demands Study: Development of the Occupational Physical Assessment Test for Combat Arms soldiers

被引:46
作者
Foulis, Stephen A. [1 ]
Sharp, Marilyn A. [1 ]
Redmond, Jan E. [1 ]
Frykman, Peter N. [1 ]
Warr, Bradley J. [1 ]
Gebhardt, Deborah L. [2 ]
Baker, Todd A. [2 ]
Canino, Maria C. [1 ]
Zambraski, Edward J. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Army Res Inst Environm Med, Mil Performance Div, Natick, MA 01760 USA
[2] Human Resources Res Org, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
Physical employment standards; Pre-employment screening; Criterion measure task simulations; Military; Fitness; Validation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsams.2017.07.018
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Objectives: The United States Army sought to create a legally defensible, scientifically validated physical pre-employment screening test. The purpose of this study was to identify a single combination of predictor tests that would predict physical performance on all of the criterion measure task simulations relevant to the Combat Arms military occupational specialties. Design: Concurrent validation. Methods: Data from 838 (608 males, 230 females) soldiers who completed both the criterion measure task simulations of a military occupational specialty and up to 14 predictor tests were used in the development of the test batteries. Stepwise regressions were used to identify test batteries that significantly predicted performance on the criterion measure task simulations of the military occupational specialties. Results: Three test batteries were developed based on different subsets of the predictor tests: Test Battery 1 consisted of the medicine ball put, squat lift, beep test, standing long jump, and arm ergometer (adjusted R-2 = 0.80-0.85, p <0.01); Test Battery 2 consisted of the medicine ball put, squat lift, beep test, and standing long jump (adjusted R-2 = 0.79-0.80, p <0.01); and Test Battery 3 consisted of the standing long jump, 1-minute push-ups, 1-minute sit-ups, 300 m sprint, and Illinois agility test (adjusted R-2 =0.55-O.71, p <0.01). Conclusions: Test Battery 2 was selected as the Army's Occupational Physical Assessment Test. It was highly predictive of performance of the Combat Arms military occupational specialties, required no complex equipment, and covered a range of physical fitness domains. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Sports Medicine Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:S74 / S84
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Occupation and other risk factors for injury among enlisted US Army Soldiers [J].
Anderson, M. K. ;
Grier, T. ;
Canham-Chervak, M. ;
Bushman, T. T. ;
Jones, B. H. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 129 (05) :531-538
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, DEP DEF INSTR 1308 3
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, DEP DEF INSTR 1308 1
[4]  
Clark Leslie L, 2016, MSMR, V23, P9
[5]  
Department of the Army, 2013, ARM PHYS READ TRAIN
[6]  
Department of the Army, 2013, ARM BOD COMP PROGR A
[7]   A Comparison of Obesity Prevalence: Military Health System and United States Populations, 2009-2012 [J].
Eilerman, Patricia A. ;
Herzog, Catherine M. ;
Luce, Beverly K. ;
Chao, Susan Y. ;
Walker, Sandra M. ;
Zarzabal, Lee A. ;
Carnahan, David H. .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 2014, 179 (05) :462-470
[8]   Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations [J].
Epstein, Yoram ;
Yanovich, Ran ;
Moran, Daniel S. ;
Heled, Yuval .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 113 (11) :2673-2690
[9]   PERSPECTIVES ON AEROBIC AND STRENGTH INFLUENCES ON MILITARY PHYSICAL READINESS: REPORT OF AN INTERNATIONAL MILITARY PHYSIOLOGY ROUNDTABLE [J].
Friedl, Karl E. ;
Knapik, Joseph J. ;
Hakkinen, Keijo ;
Baumgartner, Neal ;
Groeller, Herbert ;
Taylor, Nigel A. S. ;
Duarte, Antonio F. A. ;
Kyrolainen, Heikki ;
Jones, Bruce H. ;
Kraemer, William J. ;
Nindl, Bradley C. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2015, 29 :S10-S23
[10]  
Friedl Karl E, 2012, J Strength Cond Res, V26 Suppl 2, pS87, DOI 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825ced6c