Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction

被引:241
|
作者
Zhang, Zengming [1 ]
Li, Yu [1 ]
Lin, Biaoyang [1 ]
Schroeder, Michael [2 ]
Huang, Bingding [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Syst Biol Div, Zhejiang Calif Int NanoSyst Inst, Hangzhou 310029, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Ctr Biotechnol, Bioinformat Grp, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
关键词
COMPUTED ATLAS; CD-HIT; DRUGGABILITY; POCKETS; TOPOGRAPHY; SITEHOUND; SEQUENCES; TARGETS; SERVER; CASTP;
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btr331
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: Protein-ligand binding sites are the active sites on protein surface that perform protein functions. Thus, the identification of those binding sites is often the first step to study protein functions and structure-based drug design. There are many computational algorithms and tools developed in recent decades, such as LIGSITE(cs/c), PASS, Q-SiteFinder, SURFNET, and so on. In our previous work, MetaPocket, we have proved that it is possible to combine the results of many methods together to improve the prediction result. Results: Here, we continue our previous work by adding four more methods Fpocket, GHECOM, ConCavity and POCASA to further improve the prediction success rate. The new method MetaPocket 2.0 and the individual approaches are all tested on two datasets of 48 unbound/bound and 210 bound structures as used before. The results show that the average success rate has been raised 5% at the top 1 prediction compared with previous work. Moreover, we construct a non-redundant dataset of drug-target complexes with known structure from DrugBank, DrugPort and PDB database and apply MetaPocket 2.0 to this dataset to predict drug binding sites. As a result, > 74% drug binding sites on protein target are correctly identified at the top 3 prediction, and it is 12% better than the best individual approach.
引用
收藏
页码:2083 / 2088
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Survey on Computational Approaches for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction
    Zhang, Ran
    Wang, Xuezhi
    Wang, Jiajia
    Meng, Zhen
    Computer Engineering and Applications, 2023, 59 (12): : 1 - 13
  • [42] Computational approaches to the study of dual-site and peripheral site binding ache inhibitors
    Recanatini, M
    Cavalli, A
    Bottegoni, G
    CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 2005, 157 : 414 - 415
  • [43] Ligand-binding site prediction using ligand-interacting and binding site-enriched protein triangles
    Xie, Zhong-Ru
    Hwang, Ming-Jing
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 28 (12) : 1579 - 1585
  • [44] Epitope prediction for MSP119 protein in Plasmodium yeolii using computational approaches
    Dhusia K.
    Kesarwani P.
    Yadav P.K.
    Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics, 2016, 5 (1)
  • [45] Binding Site and Affinity Prediction of General Anesthetics to Protein Targets Using Docking
    Liu, Renyu
    Perez-Aguilar, Jose Manuel
    Liang, David
    Saven, Jeffery G.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 114 (05): : 947 - 955
  • [46] Computational Methods for Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Using Multiple Sequence Alignments
    Heringa, Jaap
    CURRENT PROTEIN & PEPTIDE SCIENCE, 2000, 1 (03) : 273 - 301
  • [47] Protein ligand binding site prediction using graph transformer neural network
    Ishitani, Ryuichiro
    Takemoto, Mizuki
    Tomii, Kentaro
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [48] Identification of a protein binding site on the surface of the alphavirus nucleocapsid and its implication in virus assembly
    Lee, S
    Owen, KE
    Choi, HK
    Lee, H
    Lu, GG
    Wengler, G
    Brown, DT
    Rossmann, MG
    Kuhn, RJ
    STRUCTURE, 1996, 4 (05) : 531 - 541
  • [49] Identification of RNA-binding protein residues using machine learning approaches
    Huang, HC
    2005 EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (EITC), 2005, : 120 - 121
  • [50] Computational allosteric ligand binding site identification on Ras proteins
    McCarthy, Michael
    Prakash, Priyanka
    Gorfe, Alemayehu A.
    ACTA BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA SINICA, 2016, 48 (01) : 3 - 10