Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction

被引:241
|
作者
Zhang, Zengming [1 ]
Li, Yu [1 ]
Lin, Biaoyang [1 ]
Schroeder, Michael [2 ]
Huang, Bingding [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Syst Biol Div, Zhejiang Calif Int NanoSyst Inst, Hangzhou 310029, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Ctr Biotechnol, Bioinformat Grp, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
关键词
COMPUTED ATLAS; CD-HIT; DRUGGABILITY; POCKETS; TOPOGRAPHY; SITEHOUND; SEQUENCES; TARGETS; SERVER; CASTP;
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btr331
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: Protein-ligand binding sites are the active sites on protein surface that perform protein functions. Thus, the identification of those binding sites is often the first step to study protein functions and structure-based drug design. There are many computational algorithms and tools developed in recent decades, such as LIGSITE(cs/c), PASS, Q-SiteFinder, SURFNET, and so on. In our previous work, MetaPocket, we have proved that it is possible to combine the results of many methods together to improve the prediction result. Results: Here, we continue our previous work by adding four more methods Fpocket, GHECOM, ConCavity and POCASA to further improve the prediction success rate. The new method MetaPocket 2.0 and the individual approaches are all tested on two datasets of 48 unbound/bound and 210 bound structures as used before. The results show that the average success rate has been raised 5% at the top 1 prediction compared with previous work. Moreover, we construct a non-redundant dataset of drug-target complexes with known structure from DrugBank, DrugPort and PDB database and apply MetaPocket 2.0 to this dataset to predict drug binding sites. As a result, > 74% drug binding sites on protein target are correctly identified at the top 3 prediction, and it is 12% better than the best individual approach.
引用
收藏
页码:2083 / 2088
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identification of protein binding surfaces using surface triplet propensities
    Mehio, Wissam
    Kemp, Graham J. L.
    Taylor, Paul
    Walkinshaw, Malcolm D.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 26 (20) : 2549 - 2555
  • [32] Algorithmic approaches to protein-protein interaction site prediction
    Tristan T Aumentado-Armstrong
    Bogdan Istrate
    Robert A Murgita
    Algorithms for Molecular Biology, 10
  • [33] Algorithmic approaches to protein-protein interaction site prediction
    Aumentado-Armstrong, Tristan T.
    Istrate, Bogdan
    Murgita, Robert A.
    ALGORITHMS FOR MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2015, 10
  • [34] Increasing the accuracy of protein binding site prediction
    Ngan, Chi Ho
    Hall, David
    Zerbe, Brandon
    Kozakov, Dima
    Vajda, Sandor
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [35] Computational procedure for transferring binding site into a protein scaffold
    Fazelinia, Hossein
    Maranas, Costas D.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2007, : 203A - 203A
  • [36] Computational prediction of transcription-factor binding site locations
    Bulyk, ML
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2004, 5 (01):
  • [37] Computational prediction of the binding site of proteinase 3 to the plasma membrane
    Hajjar, Eric
    Mihajlovic, Maja
    Witko-Sarsat, Veronique
    Lazaridis, Themis
    Reuter, Nathalie
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 71 (04) : 1655 - 1669
  • [38] Computational prediction and validation of specific EmbR binding site on PknH
    Na, Insung
    Dai, Huanqin
    Li, Hantian
    Gupta, Anvita
    Kreda, David
    Zhang, Powell
    Chen, Xiangyin
    Zhang, Lixin
    Alterovitz, Gil
    SYNTHETIC AND SYSTEMS BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 6 (04) : 429 - 436
  • [39] Using drug-drug and protein-protein similarities as feature vector for drug-target binding prediction
    Tanoori, Betsabeh
    Jahromi, Mansoor Zolghadri
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2021, 217 (217)
  • [40] Computational prediction of transcription-factor binding site locations
    Bulyk M.L.
    Genome Biology, 5 (1)