Beyond Income: Why We Want to Keep on Working Even if We Don't Need the Money

被引:6
作者
Wielers, Rudi [1 ]
van der Meer, Peter H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Sociol, ICS, Grote Rozenstr 31, Groningen 9712 TG, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, POB 800, Groningen 9700 AV, Netherlands
关键词
Non-financial work motivation; Work commitment; Basic income; Intrinsic motivation; Life satisfaction; Meaning of work; EMPLOYMENT COMMITMENT; SELF-DETERMINATION; JOB-SATISFACTION; ORIENTATIONS; INCENTIVES; INSECURITY; CENTRALITY; OVERTIME; REGIMES; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s11482-020-09834-1
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This research focuses upon non-financial work motivation against the background of the debate about the introduction of a basic income. We focus on work commitment; that is the question what binds workers to the employment system except for the wage. We argue that work commitment measures intrinsic work motivation, and that intrinsic work motivation is dependent on the extent to which paid work satisfies the human needs of autonomy, competence and relatedness. Empirical analyses on ESS 2010 for 26 countries show that 55% of the European employees would go on working if means would allow not to and about 25% not. Workers who answer affirmatively work in jobs with high levels of autonomy, good development opportunities, and have co-worker support. Greater autonomy, not only in the job, but also in decisions about work times and the number of work hours, is associated with greater work commitment. Workers in temporary jobs and workers in financial problems have low work commitment. We conclude by arguing that the introduction of a basic income will increase work commitment, because it will relieve workers' strains and stresses, and will be an incentive for employers to improve the quality of work.
引用
收藏
页码:1613 / 1635
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
[11]   'Objective' vs 'subjective' job insecurity:: Consequences of temporary work for job satisfaction and organizational commitment in four European countries [J].
De Witte, H ;
Näswall, K .
ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY, 2003, 24 (02) :149-188
[12]   The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior [J].
Deci, EL ;
Ryan, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2000, 11 (04) :227-268
[13]   Only fools? Reconsidering the relationship between commitment to the work ethic and educational attainment [J].
Dunn, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND WORK, 2013, 26 (01) :1-20
[14]  
Furnham Adrian., 1990, PROTESTANT WORK ETHI
[15]   Work pressure in Europe 1996-2001: Trends and determinants [J].
Gallie, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2005, 43 (03) :351-375
[16]  
Gallie D., 2013, EC CRISIS QUALITY WO, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664719.001.0001
[17]  
Gallie D., 2009, Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work
[18]   Welfare regimes, employment systems and job preference orientations [J].
Gallie, Duncan .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 23 (03) :279-293
[19]  
Graeber David, 2018, Bullshit Jobs: a theory
[20]  
Green F., 2006, DEMANDING WORK PARAD