Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis

被引:10
作者
Islam, M. Kamrul [1 ,2 ]
Ruths, Sabine [3 ,4 ]
Jansen, Kristian [3 ,5 ]
Falck, Runa [6 ]
Rutten-van Molken, Maureen [7 ]
Askildsen, Jan Erik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Econ, Postboks 7802, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[2] NORCE Norwegian Res Ctr, Dept Social Sci, Bergen, Norway
[3] NORCE Norwegian Res Ctr, Res Unit Gen Practice, Bergen, Norway
[4] Univ Bergen, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Bergen, Norway
[5] Municipal Bergen, Dept Nursing Homes, Bergen, Norway
[6] Univ Bergen, Dept Comparat Polit, Bergen, Norway
[7] Erasmus Univ, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Frail elderly; Holistic assessment; Continuity of care; Integrated care; Mixed methods; Discrete choice experiment; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Multi-morbidity; Primary care; Quasi-experimental design; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HEALTH; MCDA; IMPLEMENTATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDITY; OUTCOMES; PEOPLE; CHOICE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background To provide value-based care for patients with multi-morbidity, innovative integrated care programmes and comprehensive evaluations of such programmes are required. In Norway, a new programme called "Holistic Continuity of Patient Care" (HCPC) addresses the issue of multi-morbidity by providing integrated care within learning networks for frail elderly patients who receive municipal home care services or a short-term stay in a nursing home. This study conducts a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to evaluate whether the HCPC programme performs better on a large set of outcomes corresponding to the 'triple aim' compared to usual care. Methods Prospective longitudinal survey data were collected at baseline and follow-up after 6-months. The assessment of HCPC was implemented by a novel MCDA framework. The relative weights of importance of the outcomes used in the MCDA were obtained from a discrete choice experiment among five different groups of stakeholders. The performance score was estimated using a quasi-experimental design and linear mixed methods. Performance scores were standardized and multiplied by their weights of importance to obtain the overall MCDA value by stakeholder group. Results At baseline in the HCPC and usual care groups, respectively, 120 and 89 patients responded, of whom 87 and 41 responded at follow-up. The average age at baseline was 80.0 years for HCPC and 83.6 for usual care. Matching reduced the standardized differences between the groups for patient background characteristics and outcome variables. The MCDA results indicated that HCPC was preferred to usual care irrespective of stakeholders. The better performance of HCPC was mostly driven by improvements in enjoyment of life, psychological well-being, and social relationships and participation. Results were consistent with sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulation. Conclusion Frail elderly with multi-morbidity represent complex health problems at large costs for society in terms of health- and social care. This study is a novel contribution to assessing and understanding HCPC programme performance respecting the multi-dimensionality of desired outcomes. Integrated care programmes like HCPC may improve well-being of patients, be cost-saving, and contribute to the pursuit of evidence based gradual reforms in the care of frail elderly.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Integrated Care Models: An Overview (Working Document)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, IHI Innovation Series white paper
[3]   The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence [J].
Baxter, Susan ;
Johnson, Maxine ;
Chambers, Duncan ;
Sutton, Anthea ;
Goyder, Elizabeth ;
Booth, Andrew .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
[4]   PERFORMANCE OF A 5-ITEM MENTAL-HEALTH SCREENING-TEST [J].
BERWICK, DM ;
MURPHY, JM ;
GOLDMAN, PA ;
WARE, JE ;
BARSKY, AJ ;
WEINSTEIN, MC .
MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (02) :169-176
[5]   The Triple Aim: Care, health, and cost [J].
Berwick, Donald M. ;
Nolan, Thomas W. ;
Whittington, John .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2008, 27 (03) :759-769
[6]   Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of proactive and multidisciplinary integrated care for older people with complex problems in general practice: an individual participant data meta-analysis [J].
Blom, J. W. ;
Van den Hout, W. B. ;
Den Elzen, W. P. J. ;
Drewes, Y. M. ;
Bleijenberg, N. ;
Fabbricotti, I. N. ;
Jansen, A. P. D. ;
Kempen, G. I. J. M. ;
Koopmans, R. ;
Looman, W. M. ;
Melis, R. J. F. ;
Metzelthin, S. F. ;
van Charante, E. P. Moll ;
Muntinga, M. E. ;
Numans, M. E. ;
Ruikes, F. G. H. ;
Spoorenberg, S. L. W. ;
Stijnen, T. ;
Suijker, J. J. ;
De Wit, N. J. ;
Wynia, K. ;
Wind, A. W. ;
Gussekloo, J. .
AGE AND AGEING, 2018, 47 (05) :705-714
[7]   Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P) [J].
Bouwmans, Clazien ;
Jong, Kim De ;
Timman, Reinier ;
Zijlstra-Vlasveld, Moniek ;
Van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina ;
Tan, Siok Swan ;
Hakkaart-van Roijen, Leona .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
[8]   Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: a review of reviews [J].
Briggs, Andrew M. ;
Valentijn, Pim P. ;
Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran A. ;
de Carvalho, Islene Araujo .
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (04)
[9]   The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA) [J].
Cardol, M ;
de Haan, RJ ;
van den Bos, GAM ;
de Jong, BA ;
de Groot, IJM .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 13 (05) :411-419
[10]   A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies [J].
Chatfield, MD ;
Brayne, CE ;
Matthews, FE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (01) :13-19