Laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy

被引:73
|
作者
Sotelo, R
Spaliviero, M
Garcia-Segui, A
Hasan, W
Novoa, J
Desai, MM
Kaouk, JH
Gill, IS
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol Inst, Sect Laparoscop & Robot Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] La Floresta Med Inst, Caracas, Venezuela
关键词
prostate; prostatectomy; laparoscopy; prostatic hyperplasia;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000152651.27143.b0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Open retropubic simple prostatectomy is occasionally performed for symptomatic, large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia. We describe the technique of laparoscopic simple retropubic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Since August 2001 at our 2 institutions laparoscopic simple retropubic prostatectomy has been performed in 17 patients with symptomatic significant prostatomegaly on transrectal ultrasonography (60 gm or greater, mean 93). Essential aspects of our 5 port technique are transverse cystotomy just proximal to the prostatovesical junction, subcapsular plane development, prostatic adenomectomy, prostatic fossa trigonization and prostatic capsule suture repair. Demographic, perioperative and outcome data were recorded. Results: Mean operative time was 156 minutes (range 85 to 380), blood loss was 516 ml (range 100 to 2,500), hospital stay was 48 hours (range 15 to 110), and Foley catheter duration was 6.3 days (range 3 to 7). Mean specimen weight on pathological examination was 72 gm (range 32 to 120). Five patients (29%) required blood transfusion. Complications occurred in 3 patients (19%), that is intraoperative hemorrhage, catheter clot obstruction and duodenal ulcer bleeding in 1 each. All patients reported complete continence during a followup period of 1 month to 2 years. Considerable improvement from baseline was noted in American Urological Association score (preoperative vs postoperative 24.5 vs 9.9) and the maximum urine flow rate (preoperative vs postoperative 7 vs 22.8 cc per minute). Conclusions: Laparoscopic simple retropubic prostatectomy for large benign prostate hyperplasia is feasible. Our initial experience is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 760
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early Experience with Laparoscopic Retropubic Simple Prostatectomy in Patients with Voluminous Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
    Yun, Han Ki
    Kwon, Joon Beom
    Cho, Sung Ryong
    Kim, Jae Soo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (05) : 323 - 329
  • [2] Finger assisted laparoscopic retropubic prostatectomy (millin)
    Hoeffner, Jean-Luc
    Gaston, Richard
    Piechaud, Thierry
    Rey, Denis
    Mugnier, Camille
    Njinou, Bertin
    Pansadoro, Alberto
    Barmoshe, Sas
    Lufuma, Mata Emmanuel
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2006, 5 (19) : 962 - 967
  • [3] Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: A comparative study
    Baumert, H
    Ballaro, A
    Dugardin, F
    Kaisary, AV
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (05) : 1691 - 1694
  • [4] Surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: a comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgery
    Elcio Silva
    Ubirajara Ferreira
    Gustavo D. Silva
    Mirandolino B. Mariano
    Nelson R. Netto
    Athanase Billis
    Luis A. Magna
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2007, 39 : 865 - 869
  • [5] Surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: a comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgery
    Silva, Elcio
    Ferreira, Ubirajara
    Silva, Gustavo D.
    Mariano, Mirandolino B.
    Netto, Nelson R., Jr.
    Billis, Athanase
    Magna, Luis A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2007, 39 (03) : 865 - 869
  • [6] Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective assessment of postoperative pain
    Webster, TM
    Herrell, SD
    Chang, SS
    Cookson, MS
    Baumgartner, RG
    Anderson, LW
    Smith, JA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (03) : 912 - 914
  • [7] Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?
    Basiri, Abbas
    de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
    Tabatabaei, Shahin
    Woo, Henry H.
    Laguna, M. Pilar
    Shemshaki, Hamidreza
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (04) : 609 - 621
  • [8] Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?
    Abbas Basiri
    Jean JMCH de la Rosette
    Shahin Tabatabaei
    Henry H. Woo
    M. Pilar Laguna
    Hamidreza Shemshaki
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 609 - 621
  • [9] Comprehensive Standardized Report of Complications of Retropubic and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Rabbani, Farhang
    Yunis, Luis Herran
    Pinochet, Rodrigo
    Nogueira, Lucas
    Vora, Kinjal C.
    Eastham, James A.
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Laudone, Vincent
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Touijer, Karim
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (03) : 371 - 386
  • [10] Drain-free simple retropubic prostatectomy with fibrin sealant
    Morey, AF
    McDonough, RC
    Kizer, WS
    Foley, JP
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (02) : 627 - 629