Morphologic and Operative Evolution of Open Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

被引:1
|
作者
Scott, Daniel J. [1 ]
Steenberge, Sean P. [1 ]
Bena, James F. [1 ]
Lyden, Sean P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Vasc Surg, 9500 Euclid Ave,Desk F30, Cleveland, OH 44145 USA
关键词
ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR; OPEN SURGERY; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; GRAFTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2019.08.098
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Increased use of endovascular repair for intact abdominal aortic aneurysms has fundamentally shifted the approach to ruptured aneurysms. Unfortunately, not all patients are anatomically suited for endovascular repair. It is hypothesized that, in the endovascular era, patients undergoing open repair are increasingly complex; with an unknown impact on postoperative morbidity and mortality. Material and Methods: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation database was queried for all patients undergoing open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) from 2006 to 2015. Electronic medical charts and cross-sectional imaging were retrospectively reviewed. The overall patient cohort was dichotomized between early (E- OR, 2006 to 2010) and late open repairs ( L-OR, 2011 to 2015). Groups were compared based on demographic, anatomic, and perioperative variables. The primary endpoint was perioperative mortality. Secondary endpoints included overall mortality, late aneurysm-related mortality, and perioperative morbidity. Results: Of 140 patients who underwent open repair of rAAA (63, E-OR; 77, L-OR), 76% had cross-sectional imaging available for review. Aneurysm repairs in the later time period had significantly shorter infrarenal neck lengths, were more likely to have a prior aortic intervention, tended to have poor access vessels, and were more likely to require visceral or renal revascularization (each P < 0.05). While late survival did not differ between time periods, perioperative mortality (27 vs. 46%, P = 0.021) and late aneurysm-related mortality (29.9% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.031) was lower for L-OR compared with E-OR. While no anatomic variables significantly impacted survival, early time period of repair, presence of chronic kidney disease, and need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation were predictive of both perioperative and overall mortality on univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Despite the increasing anatomic and operative complexity of patients undergoing open repair of rAAAs, perioperative mortality and late aneurysm-related mortality have improved over time. These results highlight the need for both systems and expertise needed to appropriately treat this changing patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 82
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Rationale for Continuing Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Markovic, Miroslav
    Tomic, Ivan
    Ilic, Nikola
    Dragas, Marko
    Koncar, Igor
    Bukumiric, Zoran
    Sladojevic, Milos
    Davidovic, Lazar
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 36 : 64 - 73
  • [2] Endovascular versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    McHugh, S. M.
    Aherne, T.
    Goetz, T.
    Byrne, J.
    Boyle, E.
    Allen, M.
    Leahy, A.
    Moneley, D.
    Naughton, P.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2016, 14 (05): : 274 - 277
  • [3] A Comparison of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Repair for Ruptured Aortic Abdominal Aneurysms
    Alnefaie, Samaher A.
    Alzahrani, Yasser A.
    Alzahrani, Bashair S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [4] Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: open surgical repair versus endovascular repair
    Ucles Cabeza, Oscar
    Martinez Lopez, Isaac
    Pla Sanchez, Ferran
    Baturone Blanco, Adriana
    Serrano Hernando, Francisco Javier
    ANGIOLOGIA, 2021, 73 (04): : 173 - 181
  • [5] Endovascular vs open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Nedeau, April E.
    Pomposelli, Frank B.
    Hamdan, Allen D.
    Wyers, Mark C.
    Hsu, Richard
    Sachs, Teviah
    Siracuse, Jeffrey J.
    Schermerhorn, Mark L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 56 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [6] Endovascular repair or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a Cochrane systematic review
    Badger, S. A.
    Harkin, D. W.
    Blair, P. H.
    Ellis, P. K.
    Kee, F.
    Forster, R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (02):
  • [7] Association of Operative Repair Type and Trauma Center Designation With Outcomes in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Wessels, Lyndsey E.
    Calvo, Richard Y.
    Sise, Michael J.
    Bowie, Jason M.
    Butler, William J.
    Bansal, Vishal
    Sise, C. Beth
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 54 (04) : 325 - 332
  • [8] Comparison of contemporary and historical outcomes of elective and ruptured open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Pomy, Benjamin J.
    Devlin, Joseph
    Lala, Salim
    Amdur, Richard L.
    Ricotta, John J.
    Sidawy, Anton N.
    Nguyen, Bao-Ngoc
    Macsata, Robyn A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (02) : 543 - 551
  • [9] Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Octogenarians
    Opfermann, P.
    von Allmen, R.
    Diehm, N.
    Widmer, M. K.
    Schmidli, J.
    Dick, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 42 (04) : 475 - 483
  • [10] Endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm confers an early survival benefit over open repair
    Antoniou, George A.
    Georgiadis, George S.
    Antoniou, Stavros A.
    Pavlidis, Polyvios
    Maras, Dimitrios
    Sfyroeras, George S.
    Georgakarakos, Efstratios I.
    Lazarides, Miltos K.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 58 (04) : 1091 - 1105