A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G x E interaction

被引:181
作者
Flores, F [1 ]
Moreno, MT
Cubero, JI
机构
[1] Univ Huelva, EPS La Rabida, Dept Ciencias Agroforestales, Palos De La Frontera 21819, Huelva, Spain
[2] Ctr Invest & Formac Agrario, Dept Mejora & Agron, Cordoba 14080, Spain
[3] Univ Cordoba, Dept Genet, E-14080 Cordoba, Spain
关键词
genotype-environment interaction; principal components analysis; stability; yield;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00095-6
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Twenty-two different methods (parametric, nonparametric and multivariate) used for analysing genotype X environment (G X E) interaction were compared by applying them to two sets of experimental data (15 faba bean cultivars X 12 environments and 11 pea cultivars X 16 environments). A principal components analysis was performed on the rank correlation matrix arising from the application of each method. The 22 methods can be categorized, in both sets of experimental data, in three groups: (1) those which are mostly associated with yield level and show little or no correlation with stability parameters; (2) those in which both yield level and stability of performance are considered simultaneously to reduce the effect of G x E interaction; and (3) those methods which only measure stability. This analysis also separated those methods based on an agronomic concept of stability from those which are based on a biological one, as well as distinguishing between 'dynamic' and 'static' stability-based methods. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 286
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTS TO CONTROL GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS WITH AN APPLICATION TO COTTON [J].
ABOUELFITTOUH, HA ;
RAWLINGS, JO ;
MILLER, PA .
CROP SCIENCE, 1969, 9 (02) :135-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Multivariate analysis
[3]   TESTS FOR CROSSOVER GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENTAL INTERACTIONS [J].
BAKER, RJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1988, 68 (02) :405-410
[4]   CORRELATIONS AMONG SOME STATISTICAL MEASURES OF PHENOTYPIC STABILITY [J].
BECKER, HC .
EUPHYTICA, 1981, 30 (03) :835-840
[5]   STABILITY ANALYSIS IN PLANT-BREEDING [J].
BECKER, HC ;
LEON, J .
PLANT BREEDING, 1988, 101 (01) :1-23
[6]   A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF 2 METHODS OF SELECTING LOCATIONS USED FOR TESTING SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS [J].
BRANDLE, JE ;
ARTHUR, LM .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1992, 83 (03) :301-304
[7]   MEASUREMENT AND SIGNIFICANCE OF GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS IN GRASSES [J].
BREESE, EL .
HEREDITY, 1969, 24 :27-&
[8]  
Burr E. J., 1970, Australian Computer Journal, V2, P98
[9]  
Comstock R.E., 1963, Statistical genetics and plant breeding, P164, DOI [10.4236/ojs.2021.116060, DOI 10.17226/20264]
[10]  
Crossa J., 1990, Advances in Agronomy, V44, P55, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60818-4