Minor endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by large balloon dilation for large choledocholith treatment

被引:15
|
作者
Xu, Xiao-Dan [1 ]
Chen, Bo [1 ]
Dai, Jian-Jun [1 ]
Qian, Jian-Qing [1 ]
Xu, Chun-Fang [2 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Changshu Affiliated Hosp, 1 Shuyuan St, Changshu 215500, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Soozhou 215000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; Pancreatitis; Endoscopic sphincterotomy; Common bile duct stones; BILE-DUCT STONES; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPSY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; LONG-TERM; REMOVAL; MANAGEMENT; PLUS; COMPLICATIONS; DILATATION;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v23.i31.5739
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM To evaluate early and late outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) with minor endoscopic sphincterotomy (mEST) for stone removal. METHODS A total of 149 consecutive patients with difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones (diameter >= 10 mm or >= 3 stones) underwent conventional endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) or mEST plus EPLBD from May 2012 to April 2016. Their demographic, laboratory and procedural data were collected, and pancreaticobiliary complications were recorded. RESULTS Sixty-nine (94.5%) of the patients in the EPLBD + mEST group and 64 (84.2%) in the conventional EST group achieved stone clearance following the first session (P = 0.0421). The procedure time for EPLBD + mEST was shorter than for EST alone (42.1 +/- 13.6 min vs 47.3 +/- 11.8 min, P = 0.0128). The overall rate of early complications in the EPLBD + mEST group (11%) was lower than in the EST group (21.1%); however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.0938). The cumulative recurrence rate of cholangitis and CBD stones between the two groups was also similar. The procedure time was independently associated with post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (OR = 6.374, 95% CI: 1.193-22.624, P = 0.023), CBD stone diameter = 16 mm (OR = 7.463, 95% CI: 2.705-21.246, P = 0.0452) and use of mechanical lithotripsy (OR = 9.913, 95% CI: 3.446-23.154, P = 0.0133) were independent risk factors for stone recurrence. CONCLUSION EPLBD with mEST is more effective than EST alone for difficult CBD stone removal, with shorter procedure time and fewer early complications.
引用
收藏
页码:5739 / 5745
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Safe for Treating Large CBD Stones?
    Shim, Chan Sup
    Kim, Ji Wan
    Lee, Tae Yoon
    Cheon, Young Koog
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (04) : 251 - 259
  • [32] Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Combined with Large Balloon Dilation for Removal of Large Bile Duct Stones
    Sakai, Yuji
    Tsuyuguchi, Toshio
    Sugiyama, Harutoshi
    Nishikawa, Takao
    Kurosawa, Jo
    Saito, Masayoshi
    Tawada, Katsunobu
    Mikata, Rintaro
    Tada, Motohisa
    Ishihara, Takeshi
    Yokosuka, Osamu
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 60 (121) : 58 - 64
  • [33] Can a small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus a large-balloon dilation reduce the use of mechanical lithotripsy in patients with large bile duct stones?
    Kim, Tae Hyeon
    Oh, Hyo Jeong
    Lee, Jun Young
    Sohn, Young Woo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (10): : 3330 - 3337
  • [34] Bile Duct Stone Size May Influence the Efficacy of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy With or Without Large-Balloon Dilation: A Meta-Analysis
    Chuang, Tang-Wei
    Leung, Joseph
    Chen, Jyh-Jou
    Lee, Pei-Lun
    Tung, Hung-Da
    Fang, Min-Lin
    Ou-Yang, Mei-Chen
    Chen, Jyu-Lin
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (04): : 355 - 369
  • [35] Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of minimal endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by papillary balloon dilation for the removal of common bile duct stones
    Ishii, Shigeto
    Fujisawa, Toshio
    Ushio, Mako
    Takahashi, Sho
    Yamagata, Wataru
    Takasaki, Yusuke
    Suzuki, Akinori
    Okawa, Yoshihiro
    Ochiai, Kazushige
    Tomishima, Ko
    Kanazawa, Ryo
    Saito, Hiroaki
    Shiina, Shuichiro
    Isayama, Hiroyuki
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (06) : 344 - 350
  • [36] Is endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation a better option than endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone in removal of large bile duct stones A retrospective comparison study
    Li, Q. L.
    Gao, W. D.
    Zhang, C.
    Zhou, P. H.
    Zhong, Y. S.
    Chen, W. F.
    Zhang, Y. Q.
    Yao, L. Q.
    Xu, M. D.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 51 (06) : 13 - 17
  • [37] Delayed Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation After Sphincterotomy for Removing Large Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Acute Cholangitis
    Lee, Jong Chan
    Moon, Jong Ho
    Choi, Hyun Jong
    Kim, Dong Choon
    Choi, Moon Han
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Cha, Sang-Woo
    Cho, Young Deok
    Park, Sang-Heum
    Kim, Sun-Joo
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2014, 59 (06) : 1302 - 1306
  • [38] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in patients with periampullary diverticula
    Kim, Kook Hyun
    Kim, Tae Nyeun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (41) : 7168 - 7176
  • [39] Large balloon dilation for the treatment of recurrent bile duct stones in patients with previous endoscopic sphincterotomy: preliminary results
    Kurita, Akira
    Maguchi, Hiroyuki
    Takahashi, Kuniyuki
    Katanuma, Akio
    Osanai, Manabu
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 45 (10) : 1242 - 1247
  • [40] Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Treatment of Bile Duct Stones
    Abdul Haseeb
    Martin L. Freeman
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2019, 17 (2) : 221 - 230