Minor endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by large balloon dilation for large choledocholith treatment

被引:15
|
作者
Xu, Xiao-Dan [1 ]
Chen, Bo [1 ]
Dai, Jian-Jun [1 ]
Qian, Jian-Qing [1 ]
Xu, Chun-Fang [2 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Changshu Affiliated Hosp, 1 Shuyuan St, Changshu 215500, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Soozhou 215000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; Pancreatitis; Endoscopic sphincterotomy; Common bile duct stones; BILE-DUCT STONES; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPSY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; LONG-TERM; REMOVAL; MANAGEMENT; PLUS; COMPLICATIONS; DILATATION;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v23.i31.5739
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM To evaluate early and late outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) with minor endoscopic sphincterotomy (mEST) for stone removal. METHODS A total of 149 consecutive patients with difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones (diameter >= 10 mm or >= 3 stones) underwent conventional endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) or mEST plus EPLBD from May 2012 to April 2016. Their demographic, laboratory and procedural data were collected, and pancreaticobiliary complications were recorded. RESULTS Sixty-nine (94.5%) of the patients in the EPLBD + mEST group and 64 (84.2%) in the conventional EST group achieved stone clearance following the first session (P = 0.0421). The procedure time for EPLBD + mEST was shorter than for EST alone (42.1 +/- 13.6 min vs 47.3 +/- 11.8 min, P = 0.0128). The overall rate of early complications in the EPLBD + mEST group (11%) was lower than in the EST group (21.1%); however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.0938). The cumulative recurrence rate of cholangitis and CBD stones between the two groups was also similar. The procedure time was independently associated with post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (OR = 6.374, 95% CI: 1.193-22.624, P = 0.023), CBD stone diameter = 16 mm (OR = 7.463, 95% CI: 2.705-21.246, P = 0.0452) and use of mechanical lithotripsy (OR = 9.913, 95% CI: 3.446-23.154, P = 0.0133) were independent risk factors for stone recurrence. CONCLUSION EPLBD with mEST is more effective than EST alone for difficult CBD stone removal, with shorter procedure time and fewer early complications.
引用
收藏
页码:5739 / 5745
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Large balloon dilation for the treatment of recurrent bile duct stones prevents short-term recurrence in patients with previous endoscopic sphincterotomy
    Harada, Ryo
    Maguchi, Hiroyuki
    Takahashi, Kuniyuki
    Katanuma, Akio
    Osanai, Manabu
    Yane, Kei
    Hashigo, Syunpei
    Kaneko, Maki
    Katoh, Ryusuke
    Katoh, Shin
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2013, 20 (05) : 498 - 503
  • [22] Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones
    Kogure, Hirofumi
    Tsujino, Takeshi
    Isayama, Hiroyuki
    Takahara, Naminatsu
    Uchino, Rie
    Hamada, Tsuyoshi
    Miyabayashi, Koji
    Mizuno, Suguru
    Mohri, Dai
    Yashima, Yoko
    Kawakubo, Kazumichi
    Sasaki, Takashi
    Yamamoto, Natsuyo
    Nakai, Yousuke
    Hirano, Kenji
    Sasahira, Naoki
    Tada, Minoru
    Koike, Kazuhiko
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 49 (01) : 121 - 128
  • [23] Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic papillary regular-balloon dilation for removal of large bile-duct stones
    Fujisawa, Toshio
    Kagawa, Koichi
    Hisatomi, Kantaro
    Kubota, Kensuke
    Nakajima, Atsushi
    Matsuhashi, Nobuyuki
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (06) : 405 - 409
  • [24] Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta-analysis
    Liu, Yangyang
    Su, Peizhu
    Lin, Yinghao
    Lin, Siheng
    Xiao, Kun
    Chen, Pingyan
    An, Shengli
    Bai, Yang
    Zhi, Fachao
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 (06) : 937 - 945
  • [25] Small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation for removal of large common bile duct stones during ERCP
    Bo, Qian Jun
    Hua, Xu Li
    Min, Chen Tian
    Gen, Gu Liu
    Mei, Yang Yan
    Sheng, Lu Hua
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 29 (04) : 907 - 912
  • [26] Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs sphincterotomy alone for removal of common bile duct stones
    Guo, Shi-Bin
    Meng, Hua
    Duan, Zhi-Jun
    Li, Chun-Yan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (47) : 17962 - 17969
  • [27] Endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone versus endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation for the treatment of large bile duct stones
    Jae Chul Hwang
    Jin Hong Kim
    Sun Gyo Lim
    Soon Sun Kim
    Sung Jae Shin
    Kee Myung Lee
    Byung Moo Yoo
    BMC Gastroenterology, 13
  • [28] Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta-analysis
    Yang, Xiao-Ming
    Hu, Bing
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (48) : 9453 - 9460
  • [29] International consensus guidelines for endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation
    Kim, Tae Hyeon
    Kim, Jin Hong
    Seo, Dong Wan
    Lee, Dong Ki
    Reddy, Nageshwar D.
    Rerknimitr, Rungsun
    Ratanachu-Ek, Thawee
    Khor, Christopher J. L.
    Itoi, Takao
    Yasuda, Ichiro
    Isayama, Hiroyuki
    Lau, James Y. W.
    Wang, Hsiu-Po
    Chan, Hoi-Hung
    Hu, Bing
    Kozarek, Richard A.
    Baron, Todd H.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [30] Prospective comparative study of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones in patients above 45 years of age
    Oh, Myung Jin
    Kim, Tae Nyeun
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 47 (8-9) : 1071 - 1077