Benefit of Semiannual Ipsilateral Mammographic Surveillance Following Breast Conservation Therapy

被引:43
作者
Arasu, Vignesh A. [1 ]
Joe, Bonnie N. [1 ]
Lvoff, Natalya M. [3 ]
Leung, Jessica W. T. [4 ]
Brenner, R. James [1 ,6 ]
Flowers, Chris I. [1 ]
Moore, Dan H. [2 ,5 ]
Sickles, Edward A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[3] Calif Adv Imaging Med Associates, Novato, CA USA
[4] Calif Pacific Med Ctr, Breast Hlth Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Calif Pacific Med Ctr, Res Inst, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Bay Imaging Consultants, Alta Bates Summit Med Ctr, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY; LOCAL RECURRENCE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; CONSERVING SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVORS; TIME-COURSE; RADIOTHERAPY; GUIDELINES; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.12111458
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare cancer recurrence outcomes on the basis of compliant semiannual versus noncompliant annual ipsilateral mammographic surveillance following breast conservation therapy (BCT). Materials and Methods: A HIPAA-compliant retrospective review was performed of post-BCT examinations from 1997 through 2008 by using a deidentified database. The Committee on Human Research did not require institutional review board approval for this study, which was considered quality assurance. Groups were classified according to compliance with institutional post-BCT protocol, which recommends semiannual mammographic examinations of the ipsilateral breast for 5 years. A compliant semiannual examination was defined as an examination with an interval of 0-9 months, although no examination had intervals less than 3 months. A noncompliant annual examination was defined as an examination with an interval of 9-18 months. Cancer recurrence outcomes were compared on the basis of the last examination interval leading to diagnosis. Results: Initially, a total of 10 750 post-BCT examinations among 2329 asymptomatic patients were identified. Excluding initial mammographic follow-up, there were 8234 examinations. Of these, 7169 examinations were semiannual with 94 recurrences detected and 1065 examinations were annual with 15 recurrences detected. There were no differences in demographic risk factors or biopsy rates. Recurrences identified at semiannual intervals were significantly less advanced than those identified at annual intervals (stage I vs stage II, P = .04; stage 0 + stage I vs stage II, P = .03). Nonsignificant findings associated with semiannual versus annual intervals included smaller tumor size ( mean, 11.7 vs 15.3 mm; P = .15) and node negativity (98% vs 91%, P = .28). Conclusion: Results suggest that a semiannual interval is preferable for ipsilateral mammographic surveillance, allowing detection of a significantly higher proportion of cancer recurrences at an earlier stage than noncompliant annual surveillance. (C) RSNA, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 377
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Diagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancer
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Abraham, Linn A.
    Barlow, William E.
    Krishnaraj, Arun
    Holdridge, Regan C.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Geller, Berta M.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 124 (03) : 863 - 873
  • [2] Copeland G., 2009, CANC N AM 2002 2006, VOne
  • [3] INTENSIVE DIAGNOSTIC FOLLOW-UP AFTER TREATMENT OF PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    DELTURCO, MR
    PALLI, D
    CARIDDI, A
    CIATTO, S
    PACINI, P
    DISTANTE, V
    AZZINI, V
    BELSANTI, V
    BARTOLUCCI, R
    DICOSTANZO, F
    BERTUSI, M
    DANESE, S
    GIARDINA, G
    DAIUTO, G
    UCCELLO, V
    DELEO, G
    PUNZO, C
    GOSSO, P
    GRISO, C
    LOCATELLI, E
    MANSUTTI, M
    SANDRI, P
    MOLINO, AM
    SCHINCAGLIA, P
    TIENGHI, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (20): : 1593 - 1597
  • [4] Long-term results of local recurrence after breast conservation treatment for invasive breast cancer
    Doyle, T
    Schultz, DJ
    Peters, C
    Harris, E
    Solin, LJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [5] Ernster VL, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1546
  • [6] 5-YEAR RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY AND SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT RADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER
    FISHER, B
    BAUER, M
    MARGOLESE, R
    POISSON, R
    PILCH, Y
    REDMOND, C
    FISHER, E
    WOLMARK, N
    DEUTSCH, M
    MONTAGUE, E
    SAFFER, E
    WICKERHAM, L
    LERNER, H
    GLASS, A
    SHIBATA, H
    DECKERS, P
    KETCHAM, A
    OISHI, R
    RUSSELL, I
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (11) : 665 - 673
  • [7] Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer
    Fisher, B
    Anderson, S
    Bryant, J
    Margolese, RG
    Deutsch, M
    Fisher, ER
    Jeong, J
    Wolmark, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) : 1233 - 1241
  • [8] Greene F., 2002, AJCC cancer staging handbook: From the AJCC cancer staging manual, V6th
  • [9] Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: follow-up after treatment for breast cancer (summary of the 2005 update)
    Grunfeld, E
    Dhesy-Thind, S
    Levine, M
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 172 (10) : 1319 - 1320
  • [10] Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review
    Grunfeld, E
    Noorani, H
    McGahan, L
    Paszat, L
    Coyle, D
    van Walraven, C
    Joyce, J
    Sawka, C
    [J]. BREAST, 2002, 11 (03) : 228 - 235