The effects of chamber pressurization on soil-surface CO2 flux and the implications for NEE measurements under elevated CO2

被引:106
|
作者
Lund, CP
Riley, WJ
Pierce, LL
Field, CB
机构
[1] Carnegie Inst Washington, Dept Plant Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Sci Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
advection diffusion model; carbon dioxide; gas-exchange; pressure; soil respiration; trace gas;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00218.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Soil and ecosystem trace gas fluxes are commonly measured using the dynamic chamber technique. Although the chamber pressure anomalies associated with this method are known to be a source of error, their effects have not been fully characterized. In this study, we use results from soil gas-exchange experiments and a soil CO2 transport model to characterize the effects of chamber pressure on soil CO2 efflux in an annual California grassland. For greater than ambient chamber pressures, experimental data show that soil-surface CO2 flux decreases as a nonlinear function of increasing chamber pressure; this decrease is larger for drier soils. In dry soil, a gauge pressure of 0.5 Pa reduced the measured soil CO2 efflux by roughly 70% relative to the control measurement at ambient pressure. Results from the soil CO2 transport model show that pressurizing the flux chamber above ambient pressure effectively flushes CO2 from the soil by generating a downward now of air through the soil air-filled pore space. This advective flow of air reduces the CO2 concentration gradient across the soil-atmosphere interface, resulting in a smaller diffusive flux into the chamber head space. Simulations also show that the reduction in diffusive flux is a function of chamber pressure, soil moisture, soil texture, the depth distribution of soil CO2 generation, and chamber diameter. These results highlight the need for caution in the interpretation of dynamic chamber trace gas flux measurements. A portion of the frequently observed increase in net ecosystem carbon uptake under elevated CO2 may be an artifact resulting from the impact of chamber pressurization on soil CO2 efflux.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 281
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FIELD CHAMBER MEASUREMENTS OF CO2 FLUX FROM SOIL SURFACE
    KANEMASU, ET
    POWERS, WL
    SIJ, JW
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1974, 118 (04) : 233 - 237
  • [2] Grassland species effects on soil CO2 flux track the effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen
    Craine, JM
    Wedin, DA
    Reich, PB
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2001, 150 (02) : 425 - 434
  • [3] MICROMETEOROLOGICAL AND CHAMBER MEASUREMENTS OF CO2 FLUX FROM BARE SOIL
    DUGAS, WA
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1993, 67 (1-2) : 115 - 128
  • [4] EFFECTS OF INSPIRED CO2 ON SKIN SURFACE CO2 MEASUREMENTS
    EAST, KA
    NIELSON, DW
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1984, 105 (02): : 274 - 276
  • [5] Soil CO2 flux measurements in vineyard ecosystem
    Sirca, C
    Asunis, C
    Spano, D
    Arca, A
    Duce, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IVTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IRRIGATION OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS, 2004, (664): : 615 - 621
  • [6] The influence of nocturnal CO2 advection on CO2 flux measurements
    Eugster, Werner
    Siegrist, Franziska
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2000, 1 (02) : 177 - 188
  • [7] SOIL SURFACE CO2 FLUX IN A MINNESOTA PEATLAND
    KIM, J
    VERMA, SB
    BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 18 (01) : 37 - 51
  • [8] Soil surface CO2 flux in a boreal fen
    Arkebauer, TJ
    Jolitz, EC
    Verma, SB
    22ND CONFERENCE ON AGRICULTURAL & FOREST METEOROLOGY WITH SYMPOSIUM ON FIRE & FOREST METEOROLOGY/12TH CONFERENCE ON BIOMETEOROLOGY & AEROBIOLOGY, 1996, : 75 - 75
  • [9] Simulating net primary production and soil-surface CO2 flux of temperate forests in Northeastern China
    Liu, Xi
    Guo, Qingxi
    Wang, Chuankuan
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2011, 26 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [10] Elevated CO2 effects on canopy and soil water flux parameters measured using a large chamber in crops grown with free-air CO2 enrichment
    Burkart, S.
    Manderscheid, R.
    Wittich, K. -P.
    Loepmeier, F. J.
    Weigel, H. -J.
    PLANT BIOLOGY, 2011, 13 (02) : 258 - 269