Towards a political geography of abortion

被引:37
|
作者
Calkin, Sydney [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Dept Geog, Sci Site, Durham DH1 3LE, England
关键词
Abortion; Reproduction; Feminist political geography; Scale; Pregnancy; MEDICAL ABORTION; PUTTING ABORTION; HOME-USE; PILLS; TELEMEDICINE; GOVERNANCE; WOMEN; SCALE; MIFEPRISTONE; TERMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.11.006
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This article introduces a political geography of abortion, arguing that abortion access is an essential but overlooked site where gendered mechanisms of state control are enforced and contested. Today, abortion access is currently in the midst of a significant spatial transformation: advances in technology, medicine, and activist tactics are currently changing the geographies of abortion and working to weaken the link between access to abortion and national legal frameworks. In response to these challenges to state control over reproduction, states are responding with new tactics to re-assert authority over pregnancy and abortion. However, these changes remain under-researched in the geographical literature, which tends to sustain a focus on state-law and interstate travel. The forces currently transforming abortion access exceed these analytical frameworks: we require a multi-scalar and scale jumping account of the relationship between pro-choice activists and anti-choice states. This article makes the case for a political geography of abortion that moves beyond a state-based framework to account for changing patterns of resistance and restriction on abortion. The arguments are developed through two cases: mobile abortion clinics at sea and telemedicine abortion technology, both of which demonstrate the contestation over abortion rights at the sub- and supra-state levels.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reducing the harms of unsafe abortion: a systematic review of the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of harm reduction counselling for pregnant persons seeking induced abortion
    Stifani, Bianca Maria
    Gill, Roopan
    Kim, Caron Rahn
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2022, 48 (02) : 137 - 145
  • [42] Expanding a woman's options to include home use of misoprostol for medical abortion up until 76 days: an observational study of efficacy and safety
    Larsson, Amanda
    Ronnberg, Ann-Kristin M.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (06) : 747 - 752
  • [43] The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform
    Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
    Mullock, Alexandra
    Parsons, Jordan A.
    MEDICAL LAW REVIEW, 2022, 30 (01) : 4 - 32
  • [44] Empowerment and Privacy? Home Use of Abortion Pills in the Republic of Ireland
    Sheldon, Sally
    SIGNS, 2018, 43 (04): : 823 - 849
  • [45] Online access to abortion medications: a review of utilization and clinical outcomes
    Endler, Margit
    Cleeve, Amanda
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 63 : 74 - 86
  • [46] The interacting roles of abortion stigma and gender on attitudes toward abortion legality
    Patev, Alison J.
    Hood, Kristina B.
    Hall, Calvin J.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2019, 146 : 87 - 92
  • [47] "In patient" medical abortion versus surgical abortion: patient's satisfaction
    Di Carlo, Costantino
    Savoia, Fabiana
    Ferrara, Cinzia
    Sglavo, Gabriella
    Tommaselli, Giovanni Antonio
    Giampaolino, Pierluigi
    Cagnacci, Angelo
    Nappi, Carmine
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 (08) : 650 - 654
  • [48] Implementing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Norway 1998-2013
    Lokeland, Mette
    Bjorge, Tone
    Iversen, Ole-Erik
    Akerkar, Rupali
    Bjorge, Line
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (02) : 643 - 651
  • [49] No test medical abortion - a review of the evidence on selective use of preabortion testing
    Cleeve, Amanda
    Wallengren, Emma
    Brandell, Karin
    Lee, Sabrina
    Endler, Margit
    Reynolds-Wright, John
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 36 (05) : 378 - 383
  • [50] TelAbortion: evaluation of a direct to patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States
    Raymond, Elizabeth
    Chong, Erica
    Winikoff, Beverly
    Platais, Ingrida
    Mary, Meighan
    Lotarevich, Tatyana
    Castillo, Philicia W.
    Kaneshiro, Bliss
    Tschann, Mary
    Fontanilla, Tiana
    Baldwin, Maureen
    Schnyer, Ariela
    Coplon, Leah
    Mathieu, Nicole
    Bednarek, Paula
    Keady, Meghan
    Priegue, Esther
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 100 (03) : 173 - 177