Sample size determination for a matched-pairs study with incomplete data using exact approach

被引:9
|
作者
Shan, Guogen [1 ]
Bernick, Charles [2 ]
Banks, Sarah [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Sch Community Hlth Sci, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth, Epidemiol & Biostat Program, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Lou Ruvo Ctr Brain Hlth, Las Vegas, NV USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cognitive study; exact approach; incomplete data; missing completely at random; paired data; sample size; PREVENTION INSTRUMENT PROJECT; MCNEMAR TEST; EXACT TESTS; PROPORTIONS; EFFICIENT; DEMENTIA; TABLE; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/bmsp.12107
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This research was motivated by a clinical trial design for a cognitive study. The pilot study was a matched-pairs design where some data are missing, specifically the missing data coming at the end of the study. Existing approaches to determine sample size are all based on asymptotic approaches (e.g., the generalized estimating equation(GEE) approach). When the sample size in a clinical trial is small to medium, these asymptotic approaches may not be appropriate for use due to the unsatisfactory Type I and II error rates. For this reason, we consider the exact unconditional approach to compute the sample size for a matched-pairs study with incomplete data. Recommendations are made for each possible missingness pattern by comparing the exact sample sizes based on three commonly used test statistics, with the existing sample size calculation based on the GEE approach. An example from a real surgeon-reviewers study is used to illustrate the application of the exact sample size calculation in study designs.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 74
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sample size determination for conducting a pilot study to assess reliability of a questionnaire
    Bujang, Mohamad Adam
    Omar, Evi Diana
    Foo, Diana Hui Ping
    Hon, Yoon Khee
    RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY AND ENDODONTICS, 2024, 49 (01)
  • [42] Sample Size Determination for Paired and Unpaired Study Designs of Screening Tests
    Yuksel, Selcen
    Karaagaoglu, Ergun
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIORAL, COGNITIVE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, : 54 - 58
  • [43] Sample size determination for establishing equivalence/noninferiority via ratio of two proportions in matched-pair design
    Tang, ML
    Tang, NS
    Chan, ISF
    Chan, BPS
    BIOMETRICS, 2002, 58 (04) : 957 - 963
  • [44] Practical approach to determine sample size for building logistic prediction models using high-throughput data
    Son, Dae-Soon
    Lee, DongHyuk
    Lee, Kyusang
    Jung, Sin-Ho
    Ahn, Taejin
    Lee, Eunjin
    Sohn, Insuk
    Chung, Jongsuk
    Park, Woongyang
    Huh, Nam
    Lee, Jae Won
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 53 : 355 - 362
  • [45] Sample size calculation for the sequential parallel comparison design with binary endpoint using exact methods
    Shan, Guogen
    Zhang, Yahui
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2025, 52 (03) : 656 - 668
  • [46] Sample size calculation for agreement between two raters with binary endpoints using exact tests
    Shan, Guogen
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (07) : 2132 - 2141
  • [47] Sample Size Determination and Study Design Impact on Dose-Scale Pharmacodynamic Bioequivalence: a Case Study Using Orlistat
    Xu, Lian
    Li, Sanwang
    Wu, Wei
    Cheng, Zeneng
    Xie, Feifan
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2024, 26 (04):
  • [48] Sample size determination for a binary response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure
    Maria M. Ciarleglio
    Christopher D. Arendt
    Trials, 18
  • [49] Sample size determination for a binary response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure
    Ciarleglio, Maria M.
    Arendt, Christopher D.
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [50] Bayesian sample size determination for estimating binomial parameters from data subject to misclassification
    Rahme, E
    Joseph, L
    Gyorkos, TW
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2000, 49 : 119 - 128