Clean development mechanism: leverage for development?

被引:23
作者
Mathy, Sandrine [1 ]
Hourcade, Jean-Charles [1 ]
de Gouvello, Christophe [1 ]
机构
[1] CIRED, F-94736 Nogent Sur Marne, France
关键词
Clean development mechanism; Formalisation; Quantitative simulation;
D O I
10.3763/cpol.2001.0125
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper is to show that the investments through the clean development mechanism (CDM) can exert a leverage effect to (i) make attractive to developing countries non-binding commitments and the adoption of national policies and measures; this comes as a guarantee of non-conditionally of the mechanism to strictly environmental concerns and (ii) create a flow of additional investments and technological transfer from Annex B countries to non-Annex B countries. The Indian power sector has been chosen as an example of a sector where institutional barriers, market imperfections, and tariff distortions create a great space for Pareto improvements and leave an important potential for no-regret measures: technological transfer, air conditioned systems, transport infrastructures and removal of subsidies on consumption. This paper presents a micro-economic formalisation on (i) the evolution of profitability of current emitting technologies used in the power sector under the adoption of national policies and measures and (ii) the impact on renewable energy technologies competitiveness of emission credits in the context of CDM. This formalisation has been developed to enable quantitative simulation. A first exercise using the Markal model (used in 77 countries) on the electric sector in India enabled us to simulate the leverage effect of emission credits on additional incomes taken as a proxy for development.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 268
页数:18
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BANERJEE R, 1997, ENERGY STRATEGIES GR, P108
[2]  
*CMIE, 1998, CURR EN SC IND
[3]  
ESTRADA R, 1998, ISSUES OPTIONS CLEAN, P23
[4]  
HOURCADE JC, 1999, SUMM DISC MULT WORKS
[5]  
HUMPHREYS ST, 1998, EQUITY CDM
[6]  
*IEA, 1999, DRAFT REP IND EN CHA, P6
[7]  
*IPCC, 1993, 2 ASS REP
[8]   THE ENERGY PARADOX AND THE DIFFUSION OF CONSERVATION TECHNOLOGY [J].
JAFFE, AB ;
STAVINS, RN .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1994, 16 (02) :91-122
[9]   Strategies for risk management of joint implementation investments [J].
Janssen, J .
GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION: TECHNOLOGIES FOR ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY, 1998, :357-365
[10]  
Khanna M, 1999, ENERGY J, V20, P25