Comparison of cesarean versus vaginal delivery of extremely preterm gestations in breech presentation: retrospective cohort study

被引:7
作者
Niles, Kirsten M. [1 ]
Barrett, Jon F. R. [1 ,2 ]
Ladhani, Noor Niyar N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Breech; cesarean; delivery; fetal; preterm; NEONATAL-MORTALITY; BIRTH; SECTION; MORBIDITY; INFANTS; IMPACT; MODE; RISK; TERM; AGE;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2017.1401997
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: As survival increases at earlier gestational ages, the optimal mode of delivery, especially in cases of breech presentation, is of increasing importance. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of vaginal delivery (VD) and cesarean section (CS) births for infants in breech presentation at borderline viability. Study design: A retrospective chart review of live breech births between 23 + 0 and 25 + 6 weeks gestation at a tertiary university center from 2003 to 2013 was conducted. Those delivered vaginally were compared with those delivered by CS. Stillbirths and deliveries where no resuscitation was intended were removed from the analysis. Variables were compared using a Student t-test (continuous), Mann-Whitney U test (categorical), or a Chi-squared test (count). Logistic regression analysis was performed to further evaluate the results. Results with p < .05 were considered significant. Results: One hundred seventy-six births were included, 36 VD and 140 CS. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Gestational age at delivery was significantly higher in CS deliveries (24.9 +/- 0.6 versus 24.5 +/- 0.7, p = .0007). The rate of neonatal death (23.6% versus 44.4%, p = .0127) was significantly lower in those born by CS. All other neonatal outcomes including Apgar scores at one and 5 min, cord gases, birth weight, length of stay in NICU, incidence of respiratory complications, and incidence of high-grade IVH demonstrated no significant differences. Logistic regression suggested that male sex, lower birth weight, and earlier gestational age are significantly associated with neonatal mortality. Thirty percent of uterine incisions were of the classical, high transverse or inverted-T types. The estimated blood loss was significantly higher in CS births (706.6 +/- 226.4 versus 327.4 +/- 174.1 mL, p < .0001), but there was no difference in the rate of blood transfusion. Conclusion: CS delivery of breech infants at borderline viability had a protective effect on neonatal mortality compared to VD depending on the regression model utilized. Infant sex, birth weight, and gestational age also contribute significantly to neonatal mortality. A prospective study of planned method of delivery is recommended to further explore this finding.
引用
收藏
页码:1142 / 1147
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preterm Breech Presentation A Comparison of Intended Vaginal and Intended Cesarean Delivery
    Bergenhenegouwen, Lester
    Vlemmix, Floortje
    Ensing, Sabine
    Schaaf, Jelle
    van der Post, Joris
    Abu-Hanna, Ameen
    Ravelli, Anita C. J.
    Mol, Ben W.
    Kok, Marjolein
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (06) : 1223 - 1230
  • [2] Cesarean delivery versus vaginal delivery: impact on survival and morbidity for the breech fetus at the threshold of viability
    Deutsch, Aaron
    Salihu, Hamisu M.
    Lynch, O'Neill
    Marty, Phillip J.
    Belogolovkin, Victoria
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (05) : 713 - 717
  • [3] Breech Presentation: Vaginal Versus Cesarean Delivery, Which Intervention Leads to the Best Outcomes?
    Fonseca, Andreia
    Silva, Rita
    Rato, Ines
    Neves, Ana Raquel
    Peixoto, Carla
    Ferraz, Zita
    Ramalho, Ines
    Carocha, Ana
    Felix, Nina
    Valdoleiros, Sandra
    Galvao, Ana
    Goncalves, Daniela
    Curado, Joana
    Palma, Maria Joao
    Antunes, Isabel Lobo
    Clode, Nuno
    Graca, Luis Mendes
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2017, 30 (06): : 479 - 484
  • [4] Vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in preterm breech delivery: a systematic review
    Bergenhenegouwen, L. A.
    Meertens, L. J. E.
    Schaaf, J.
    Nijhuis, J. G.
    Mol, B. W.
    Kok, M.
    Scheepers, H. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 172 : 1 - 6
  • [5] Benefits of the 'en caul⟫ technique for extremely preterm breech vaginal delivery
    Girault, A.
    Carteau, M.
    Kefelian, F.
    Menard, S.
    Goffinet, F.
    Le Ray, C.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 51 (02)
  • [6] Is vaginal delivery of a fetus in breech presentation at an extremely preterm gestational age associated with an increased risk of neonatal death? A comparative study
    Pierre, Clementine
    Leroy, Audrey
    Pierache, Adeline
    Storme, Laurent
    Debarge, Veronique
    Depret, Sandrine
    Rakza, Thameur
    Garabedian, Charles
    Subtil, Damien
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [7] Delivery outcomes in subsequent pregnancy following primary breech cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study
    Eden-Friedman, Yehudit
    Ginosar, Yehuda
    Sela, Hen Y.
    Calderon-Margalit, Ronit
    Eventov-Friedman, Smadar
    Ezra, Yossef
    Weiniger, Carolyn F.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (09) : 1554 - 1560
  • [8] Term breech presentation-Intended cesarean section versus intended vaginal delivery-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wangberg Nordborg, Julia
    Svanberg, Therese
    Strandell, Annika
    Carlsson, Ylva
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 101 (06) : 564 - 576
  • [9] Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Maternal Benefits and Risks of Planned Cesarean Delivery compared to Planned Vaginal Delivery
    Korb, D.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2020, 48 (01): : 109 - 119
  • [10] Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in pregnant women with breech presentation undergoing spontaneous or induced vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery
    Gunay, Taner
    Turgut, Abdulkadir
    Bor, Ergul Demircivi
    Hocaoglu, Meryem
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 59 (03): : 392 - 397