Meissner effect, diamagnetism, and classical physics-a review

被引:31
作者
Essen, Hanno [1 ]
Fiolhais, Miguel C. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Dept Mech, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Coimbra, Dept Phys, LIP Coimbra, P-3004516 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
DERIVATION; SUPERCONDUCTORS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1119/1.3662027
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We review the literature on what classical physics says about the Meissner effect and the London equations. We discuss the relevance of the Bohr-van Leeuwen theorem for the perfect diamagnetism of superconductors and conclude that the theorem is based on invalid assumptions. We also point out results in the literature that show how magnetic flux expulsion from a sample cooled to superconductivity can be understood as an approach to the magnetostatic energy minimum. These results have been published several times but many textbooks on magnetism still claim that there is no classical diamagnetism, and virtually all books on superconductivity repeat Meissner's 1933 statement that flux expulsion has no classical explanation. (C) 2012 American Association of Physics Teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 169
页数:6
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Aharoni A., 2000, INTRO THEORY FERROMA, P6
[2]  
Alfven H., 1963, Cosmical Electrodynamics
[3]  
[Anonymous], ELECTRODYNAMICS CONT
[4]  
Ashcroft Neil W., 1976, SOLID STATE PHYS, P731
[5]   Understanding stable levitation of superconductors from intermediate electromagnetics [J].
Badia-Majos, A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2006, 74 (12) :1136-1142
[6]   THEORY OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY [J].
BARDEEN, J ;
COOPER, LN ;
SCHRIEFFER, JR .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1957, 108 (05) :1175-1204
[7]  
Bohr N., 1972, NIELS BOHR COLLECTED, V1, P291
[8]   MAGNETIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CHARGED PARTICLES [J].
BREITENBERGER, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1968, 36 (06) :505-+
[9]  
Cullwick E. G., 1956, P IEE C, V103, P159
[10]  
Cullwick E. G., 1956, P IEE C, V103, P441