It's Time to Reconsider The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique

被引:26
作者
Balls, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
来源
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS | 2020年 / 48卷 / 01期
关键词
alternatives; animal experiments; drug development; inhumanity; reduction; refinement; replacement; Three Rs; 3; RS;
D O I
10.1177/0261192920911339
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In the 60 years since the publication of The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, the Three Rs (Reduction, Refinement, Replacement) proposed by William Russell and Rex Burch have gradually been accepted throughout the world as ways of facing up to the ethical and scientific dilemmas involved in animal experimentation. However, the scale of animal use and the use of animals as models of humans has continued, seemingly almost unchallenged in much of the scientific community, despite the warnings about models, species differences and human variation spelled out in the The Principles. In this Comment, it is proposed that it is time to move away from the animal welfare focus of the Three Rs, in favour of a wider concept of humanity, which also embraces human welfare. In addition, since less than 10% of new drugs successfully pass from preclinical testing, which is highly reliant on animal procedures, to acceptance for clinical use, it is argued that the aim should not be to directly replace animal testing with non-animal methods with similar aims and which produce similar results, but to take advantage of developments in cell and molecular biology and in computer science, to devise new, different, appropriate, specific and intelligent stand-alone preclinical testing strategies that are applicable to particular human situations.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 46
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, IT IS DIFFICULT GET
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, CLIN DEV SUCCESS RAT
  • [3] Balls M., 2015, ATLA-ALTERN LAB ANIM, V43, pP78
  • [4] Balls M., 2009, Three Rs and the Humanity Criterion (FRAME)
  • [5] The Emergence and Early Fate of the Three Rs Concept
    Balls, Michael
    Parascandola, John
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2019, 47 (5-6): : 214 - 220
  • [6] Animal Experimentation and Alternatives: Time to Say Goodbye to the Three Rs and Hello to Humanity?
    Balls, Michael
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2014, 42 (05): : 327 - 333
  • [7] The Origins and Early Days of the Three Rs Concept
    Balls, Michael
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2009, 37 (03): : 255 - 265
  • [8] The 3Rs and Humane Experimental Technique: Implementing Change
    Hubrecht, Robert C.
    Carter, Elizabeth
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [9] Russell W.M.S., 1959, Med J Aust, DOI DOI 10.1038/1841675B0
  • [10] US Food and Drug Administration, 2004, CHALL OPP CRIT PATH