The effect of carbon emission trading scheme on energy efficiency: Evidence from China

被引:48
作者
Tan, Xiujie [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yishuang [3 ,6 ]
Dong, Hanmin [4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Zhan [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Inst Int Studies, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Climate Change & Energy Econ Study Ctr, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emission trading scheme; Energy efficiency; Green recovery; Sustainable development; INDUSTRIAL SECTOR; MARKET; INNOVATION; IMPACT; COSTS; CO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2022.06.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a global economic recession and even changed its development pattern. Improving energy efficiency has become one of the best choices worldwide to achieve green recovery in the post-COVID-19 era. Therefore, this study explores the effect of carbon emission trading scheme (ETS) pilots on energy efficiency by the difference-in-differences (DID) model, using panel data of 30 Chinese provinces from 2009 to 2020. The following results are obtained: (1) Carbon ETS pilots could significantly increase energy efficiency by an overall effect of 1.82%, among which technical efficiency might be improved more obviously than others; (2) The average effect of carbon ETS pilots may differ between provinces because of some economic regional factors, being more significant in regions with a large number of employees and high wages; (3) This positive effect is transferred through industrial structure and R & D investment.(c) 2022 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 517
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Do globalization and renewable energy contribute to carbon emissions mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa? [J].
Acheampong, Alex O. ;
Adams, Samuel ;
Boateng, Elliot .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 677 :436-446
[2]   Necessary but not sufficient: the role of energy efficiency in industrial sector low-carbon transformation [J].
Aden, Nate .
ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2018, 11 (05) :1083-1101
[3]   Evaluation of energy resilience and adaptation policies: An energy efficiency analysis [J].
Aldieri, Luigi ;
Gatto, Andrea ;
Vinci, Concetto Paolo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 157
[4]   Promoting Energy Efficiency in the Built Environment through Adapted BIM Training and Education [J].
Alhamami, Ali ;
Petri, Ioan ;
Rezgui, Yacine ;
Kubicki, Sylvain .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (09)
[5]   Bridging the gap between energy-to-GDP ratio and composite energy intensity index [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Goh, Tian .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 119 :105-112
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, State and Trends of Carbon Pricing, P2021, DOI [10.1596/978-1-4648-1728-1, DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-1728-1]
[7]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[8]   Identifying the impacts of human capital on carbon emissions in Pakistan [J].
Bano, Sadia ;
Zhao, Yuhuan ;
Ahmad, Ashfaq ;
Wang, Song ;
Liu, Ya .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 183 :1082-1092
[9]  
Barwick P.J., 2019, FOG SMOG VALUE POLLU, DOI [10.3386/w26541,w26541, DOI 10.3386/W26541,W26541]
[10]   The European Union Emissions Trading System reduced CO2 emissions despite low prices [J].
Bayer, Patrick ;
Aklin, Michael .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (16) :8804-8812