Prognostic Significance of the Preoperative Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio in Patients with Gallbladder Carcinoma

被引:5
|
作者
Xu, Weiyu [1 ]
Wu, Xiaoqian [2 ]
Wang, Xuezhu [2 ]
Yu, Si [2 ]
Xu, Gang [2 ]
Xiong, Jianping [3 ]
Zhang, Junwei [2 ]
Sang, Xinting [2 ]
Zheng, Yongchang [2 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Friendship Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll CAMS, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Liver Surg, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Friendship Hosp, Dept Intervent Radiol, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
来源
基金
北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
gallbladder cancer; lymphocyte to monocyte ratio; LMR; survival; prognosis; biomarker; B-CELL LYMPHOMA; ABSOLUTE LYMPHOCYTE; CANCER PATIENTS; TUMOR; INFLAMMATION; MACROPHAGES; MARKERS; SERUM;
D O I
10.2147/CMAR.S243326
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study was designed to investigate the prognostic value of the lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) in patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 154 consecutive GBC patients from 2005 to 2017 in this study. The LMR of preoperative blood samples was calculated by dividing the lymphocyte count by the monocyte count. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to identify the optimal cut-off value of the LMR in the determination of overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to assess OS, and the Log rank test was employed to compare survival differences. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to detect independent prognostic indicators. Results: The optimal cut-off point for the LMR was 4.76 according to the ROC curve. Patients <= 60 years old with an LMR <4.76 experienced significantly worse OS than those with an LMR >4.76 (hazard ratio (HR): 0.399, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.265-0.602, P<0.001); however, the prognostic value of the LMR was not determined in patients >60 years old or among the entire study cohort (both P>0.05). Significantly poorer OS was observed in patients >60 years with an LMR <= 4.21 compared to those with an LMR >4.21 (HR: 1.830, 95% CI: 1.129-2.967, P=0.014). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that both the high and low LMR cut-off values were independent risk factors for OS (HR: 0.272, 95% CI: 0.105-0.704, P=0.007; HR: 0.544, 95% CI: 0.330-0.895, P=0.017). Conclusion: The LMR is an independent prognostic indicator for GBC patients, the cut-off value of which is age dependent.
引用
收藏
页码:3271 / 3283
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic Value of the Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Patients with Parotid Gland Carcinoma
    Mikoshiba, Takuya
    Ozawa, Hiroyuki
    Watanabe, Yoshihiro
    Sekimizu, Mariko
    Saito, Shin
    Yoshihama, Keisuke
    Nakamura, Shintaro
    Imanishi, Yorihisa
    Kameyama, Kaori
    Ogawa, Kaoru
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (03): : E864 - E869
  • [32] Prognostic significance of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation
    Shen, Yanjun
    Wang, Huige
    Chen, Xiangmei
    Li, Wendong
    Chen, Jinglong
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2019, 12 : 7129 - 7137
  • [33] Prognostic Significance of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Patients with Osteosarcoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Cha, Junjun
    Li, Shipan
    Sui, Jidong
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2022, 36 (05): : 1321 - 1329
  • [34] Prognostic significance of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with small cell lung cancer
    Go, Se-Il
    Kim, Rock Bum
    Song, Haa-Na
    Kang, Myoung Hee
    Lee, Un Seok
    Choi, Hye Jung
    Lee, Seung Jun
    Cho, Yu Ji
    Jeong, Yi Yeong
    Kim, Ho Cheol
    Lee, Jong Deog
    Kim, Seok-Hyun
    Kang, Jung-Hun
    Ling, Hui
    Lee, Gyeong-Won
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 31 (12) : 1 - 7
  • [35] Prognostic significance of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with small cell lung cancer
    Se-Il Go
    Rock Bum Kim
    Haa-Na Song
    Myoung Hee Kang
    Un Seok Lee
    Hye Jung Choi
    Seung Jun Lee
    Yu Ji Cho
    Yi Yeong Jeong
    Ho Cheol Kim
    Jong Deog Lee
    Seok-Hyun Kim
    Jung-Hun Kang
    Hui Ling
    Gyeong-Won Lee
    Medical Oncology, 2014, 31
  • [36] Prognostic value of preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Li, Guang-Jun
    Xu, Hong-Wei
    Ji, Juan-Juan
    Yang, Fang
    Gao, Bao-Qin
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 1085 - 1092
  • [37] Preoperative Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio are Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancers Undergoing Surgery
    Lieto, Eva
    Galizia, Gennaro
    Auricchio, Annamaria
    Cardella, Francesca
    Mabilia, Andrea
    Basile, Nicoletta
    Del Sorbo, Giovanni
    Castellano, Paolo
    Romano, Ciro
    Orditura, Michele
    Napolitano, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2017, 21 (11) : 1764 - 1774
  • [38] Preoperative Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio are Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancers Undergoing Surgery
    Eva Lieto
    Gennaro Galizia
    Annamaria Auricchio
    Francesca Cardella
    Andrea Mabilia
    Nicoletta Basile
    Giovanni Del Sorbo
    Paolo Castellano
    Ciro Romano
    Michele Orditura
    Vincenzo Napolitano
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2017, 21 : 1764 - 1774
  • [39] Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a novel prognostic tool for gallbladder carcinoma
    Qing Pang
    Ling-Qiang Zhang
    Rui-Tao Wang
    Jian-Bin Bi
    Jing-Yao Zhang
    Kai Qu
    Su-Shun Liu
    Si-Dong Song
    Xin-Sen Xu
    Zhi-Xin Wang
    Chang Liu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, (21) : 6675 - 6683
  • [40] Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a novel prognostic tool for gallbladder carcinoma
    Pang, Qing
    Zhang, Ling-Qiang
    Wang, Rui-Tao
    Bi, Jian-Bin
    Zhang, Jing-Yao
    Qu, Kai
    Liu, Su-Shun
    Song, Si-Dong
    Xu, Xin-Sen
    Wang, Zhi-Xin
    Liu, Chang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (21) : 6675 - 6683