Mild and moderate to severe early acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery among patients with heart failure and preserved vs. mid-range vs. reduced ejection fraction A retrospective cohort study

被引:2
|
作者
Gao, Yuchen [1 ]
Wang, Chunrong [1 ]
Li, Jun [1 ]
Ji, Bingyang [2 ]
Wang, Jianhui [1 ]
Yan, Fuxia [1 ]
Wang, Yuefu [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Anaesthesiol, Fuwai Hosp, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Cardiopulm Bypass, Fuwai Hosp, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Shijitan Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Surg Crit Care Med, 10 Tieyi Rd, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
关键词
CO-MORBIDITIES; NONCARDIAC COMORBIDITIES; PREDICTION; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; BYPASS; ASSOCIATION; POPULATION; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0000000000001713
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Patients with heart failure who undergo cardiac surgery have increased long-term mortality in which acute kidney injury (AKI) plays a role. However, little is known about whether the incidence of AKI differs according to stratified left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). OBJECTIVES To assess the risks of mild AKI and moderate to severe AKI postcardiac surgery among patients with heart failure. DESIGN Retrospective cohort analysis of patient data. Ejection fractions were categorised as LVEF less than 40%, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); LVEF 40 to 49%, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF); and LVEF at least 50%, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). PATIENTS AND SETTINGS Patients who underwent cardiac surgery from 2012 to 2019 in Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China, were consecutively enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoint was postoperative AKI staged either as mild AKI or moderate to severe AKI. The secondary outcome was the peri-operative composite adverse event of dialysis support, tracheotomy, intrasurgical and postsurgical mechanical cardiac support and in-hospital mortality. This study also assessed chronic renal dysfunction at follow-up. RESULTS Of the 54 696 included patients, 18.9% presented with heart failure. Among these with HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF, the incidence of postoperative mild AKI was 37.0, 33.4 and 37.6%, respectively. Patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF were characterised by numerically greater prevalence of moderate to severe AKI than HFrEF (8.5 vs. 9.1 vs. 5.8%). HFrEF and HFmrEF patients had comparable risks for mild AKI relative to HFpEF patients, odds ratio (OR) 0.885; 95% confidence interval CI 0.763 to 1.027 for HFmrEF vs. HFpEF; OR 1.083; 95% CI 0.933 to 1.256 for HFrEF vs. HFpEF. Patients with HFmrEF were more at risk for moderate to severe AKI than patients with HFpEF (OR, 1.368; 95% CI 1.066 to 1.742), but HFrEF and HFpEF did not differ significantly (OR 1.012; 95% CI 0.752 to 1.346). An increasing number of noncardiac comorbidities led to a higher risk of mild AKI and moderate to severe AKI in patients with heart failure; and its effect on AKI was almost equal among the three heart failure strata. The incidence of postoperative composite adverse outcome increased in a graded manner from HFpEF to HFmrEF to HFrEF. Information on the creatine concentrations at 3 months postoperatively and longer were retained for 5200 out of 10 347 (50.6%) heart failure patients in our charts. The AKI severity and the presence of HFmrEF contributed substantially to the development of renal dysfunction over a median [IQR] follow-up of 10 months [4.0 to 21.0]. CONCLUSIONS Initiative programmes aimed at patients with HFrEF to prevent moderate to severe AKI and chronic kidney dysfunction should also include patients with HFmrEF.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 684
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Trends in cause-specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced and mid-range ejection fraction
    Cui, Xiaotong
    Thunstrom, Erik
    Dahlstrom, Ulf
    Zhou, Jingmin
    Ge, Junbo
    Fu, Michael
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2020, 7 (05): : 2894 - 2903
  • [2] Outcomes among acute heart failure emergency department patients by preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction
    Sax, Dana R.
    Rana, Jamal S.
    Mark, Dustin G.
    Huang, Jie
    Collins, Sean P.
    Liu, Dandan
    Storrow, Alan B.
    Reed, Mary E.
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (04): : 2889 - 2898
  • [3] Non-cardiac comorbidities and mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced vs. preserved ejection fraction: a study using the Swedish Heart Failure Registry
    Ergatoudes, Constantinos
    Schaufelberger, Maria
    Andersson, Bert
    Pivodic, Aldina
    Dahlstrom, Ulf
    Fu, Michael
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 108 (09) : 1025 - 1033
  • [4] Effects of glycemic control on in-hospital mortality among acute heart failure patients with reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction
    Matsushita, Kenichi
    Harada, Kazumasa
    Miyazaki, Tetsuro
    Miyamoto, Takamichi
    Iida, Kiyoshi
    Tanimoto, Shuzou
    Yagawa, Mayuko
    Takei, Makoto
    Nagatomo, Yuji
    Hosoda, Toru
    Yoshino, Hideaki
    Yamamoto, Takeshi
    Nagao, Ken
    Takayama, Morimasa
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2018, 33 (09) : 1022 - 1028
  • [5] Microalbuminuria and its Prognostic Significance in Patients with Acute Heart Failure With Preserved, Mid-Range, and Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Alata, Omer Dogan
    Biteker, Murat
    Demir, Ahmet
    Yildirim, Birdal
    Acar, Ethem
    Gokcek, Kemal
    Gokcek, Aysel
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2022, 118 (04) : 703 - 709
  • [6] The association of chronic kidney disease and microalbuminuria with heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction
    Nayor, Matthew
    Larson, Martin G.
    Wang, Na
    Santhanakrishnan, Rajalakshmi
    Lee, Douglas S.
    Tsao, Connie W.
    Cheng, Susan
    Benjamin, Emelia J.
    Vasan, Ramachandran S.
    Levy, Daniel
    Fox, Caroline S.
    Ho, Jennifer E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2017, 19 (05) : 615 - 623
  • [7] Disproportionately low BNP levels in patients of acute heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction
    Sakane, Kazushi
    Kanzaki, Yumiko
    Tsuda, Kosuke
    Maeda, Daichi
    Sohmiya, Koichi
    Hoshiga, Masaaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 327 : 105 - 110
  • [8] Mortality associated with heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in a prospective internationalmulti-ethnic cohort study
    Lam, Carolyn S. P.
    Gamble, Greg D.
    Ling, Lieng H.
    Sim, David
    Leong, Kui Toh Gerard
    Yeo, Poh Shuan Daniel
    Ong, Hean Yee
    Jaufeerally, Fazlur
    Ng, Tze P.
    Cameron, Vicky A.
    Poppe, Katrina
    Lund, Mayanna
    Devlin, Gerry
    Troughton, Richard
    Richards, A. Mark
    Doughty, Robert N.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (20) : 1770 - 1780
  • [9] BNP and obesity in acute decompensated heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Surveillance Study
    Khalid, Umair
    Wruck, Lisa Miller
    Quibrera, Pedro Miguel
    Bozkurt, Biykem
    Nambi, Vijay
    Virani, Salim S.
    Jneid, Hani
    Agarwal, Sunil
    Chang, Patricia P.
    Loehr, Laura
    Basra, Sukhdeep Singh
    Rosamond, Wayne
    Ballantyne, Christie M.
    Deswal, Anita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 233 : 61 - 66
  • [10] Non-cardiac comorbidities and mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced vs. preserved ejection fraction: a study using the Swedish Heart Failure Registry
    Constantinos Ergatoudes
    Maria Schaufelberger
    Bert Andersson
    Aldina Pivodic
    Ulf Dahlström
    Michael Fu
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2019, 108 : 1025 - 1033