Efficacy of remimazolam versus midazolam for procedural sedation: post hoc integrated analyses of three phase 3 clinical trials

被引:16
作者
Dao, Van-Anh [1 ]
Schippers, Frank [2 ]
Stohr, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] PAION Deutschland GmbH, Heussstr 25, Aachen, Germany
[2] Creat Clin Res GmbH, Berlin, Germany
关键词
SAFETY; PROPOFOL; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1055/a-1743-1936
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims Remimazolam is an ultrashort acting, fast onset/fast offset benzodiazepine for intravenous use in procedural sedation, general anesthesia, and Intensive Care Unit sedation. The aim of this work was to compare the efficacy of remimazolam versus midazolam dosed according to medical practice (real-world midazolam) and midazolam dosed according to US prescribing information (on-label midazolam) for procedural sedation. Patients and methods This post hoc analysis was performed using integrated data from three randomized, placebo, and active (midazolam) controlled, phase 3 clinical trials in patients undergoing colonoscopy and bronchoscopy. Statistical comparisons between treatment groups, without adjustment for potential confounding factors, were exploratory and observational in nature. Results The mean +/- SD dose of midazolam in the real-world midazolam group was 6.2 +/- 3.1 mg, compared with 3.5 +/- 1.5 mg in the on-label midazolam group. remimazolam showed significantly shorter time from first dose to start of procedure (median 3 minutes) compared to on-label midazolam (median 8 minutes). Recovery time from end of procedure to fully alert was significantly shorter for remimazolam (median 6 minutes) than real-world midazolam (median 14 minutes), enabling earlier transfer of patients from the procedure room to the recovery area with a lower requirement for patient monitoring. The onset and recovery times with remimazolam showed significantly less inter-patient variability than with on-label midazolam and real-world midazolam, respectively. Patients treated with remimazolam received significantly less fentanyl for analgesia (78.2 +/- 28.4 mu g) than did those treated with realworld midazolam (113.6 +/- 60.1 mu g) and on-label midazolam (92.5 +/- 40.0 mu g). Conclusions Remimazolam offers advantages over midazolam in terms of faster recovery and less fentanyl requirement, which may facilitate increased procedural throughput in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:E378 / E385
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   MIDAZOLAM ACTS SYNERGISTICALLY WITH FENTANYL FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA [J].
BENSHLOMO, I ;
ABDELKHALIM, H ;
EZRY, J ;
ZOHAR, S ;
TVERSKOY, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 64 (01) :45-47
[2]   Impact of concurrent remifentanil on the sedative effects of remimazolam, midazolam and propofol in cynomolgus monkeys [J].
Kops, Maren S. ;
Pesic, Marija ;
Petersen, Karl-Uwe ;
Schmalix, Wolfgang A. ;
Stoehr, Thomas .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 890
[3]   Adaptation of non-linear mixed amount with zero amount response surface model for analysis of concentration-dependent synergism and safety with midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol sedation [J].
Liou, J. -Y. ;
Ting, C. -K. ;
Teng, W. -N. ;
Mandell, M. S. ;
Tsou, M. -Y. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (06) :1209-1218
[4]  
Malamed SF., SEDATION GUIDE PATIE, V2016, P319
[5]  
PAION, REMIMAZOLAM SUMMARY
[6]   New horizons for sedation: The ultra short acting benzodiazepine remimazolam [J].
Pambianco, Daniel J. ;
Cash, BrooksD. .
TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 18 (01) :22-28
[7]   A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy [J].
Pambianco, Daniel J. ;
Borkett, Keith M. ;
Riff, Dennis S. ;
Winkle, Peter J. ;
Schwartz, Howard I. ;
Melson, Timothy I. ;
Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi, Karin .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) :984-992
[8]   Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Compared With Placebo and Midazolam for Moderate Sedation During Bronchoscopy [J].
Pastis, Nicholas J. ;
Yarmus, Lonny B. ;
Schippers, Frank ;
Ostroff, Randall ;
Chen, Alexander ;
Akulian, Jason ;
Wahidi, Momen ;
Shojaee, Samira ;
Tanner, Nichole T. ;
Callahan, Sean P. ;
Feldman, Gregory ;
Lorch Jr, Daniel G. ;
Ndukwu, Ikeadi ;
Pritchett, Michael A. ;
Silvestri, Gerard A. .
CHEST, 2019, 155 (01) :137-146
[9]   Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in high risk colonoscopy: A randomized trial [J].
Rex, Douglas K. ;
Bhandari, Raj ;
Lorch, Daniel G. ;
Meyers, Michael ;
Schippers, Frank ;
Bernstein, David .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2021, 53 (01) :94-101
[10]   A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy [J].
Rex, Douglas K. ;
Bhandari, Raj ;
Desta, Taddese ;
DeMicco, Michael P. ;
Schaeffer, Cynthia ;
Etzkorn, Kyle ;
Barish, Charles F. ;
Pruitt, Ronald ;
Cash, Brooks D. ;
Quirk, Daniel ;
Tiongco, Felix ;
Sullivan, Shelby ;
Bernstein, David .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 88 (03) :427-+