Attentional Capture Helps Explain Why Moral and Emotional Content Go Viral

被引:94
作者
Brady, William J. [1 ]
Gantman, Ana P. [2 ]
Van Bavel, Jay J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Brooklyn Coll, Dept Psychol, Brooklyn, NY USA
[3] NYU, Dept Psychol, 6 Washington Pl, New York, NY 10003 USA
[4] NYU, Ctr Neural Sci, New York, NY 10003 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
morality; emotion; attention; social networks; social media; AROUSING DISTRACTORS; PERCEPTION; AWARENESS; INFORMATION; DIFFUSION; CHARACTER; DYNAMICS; AMYGDALA; OUTRAGE;
D O I
10.1037/xge0000673
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Our social media newsfeeds are filled with a variety of content all battling for our limited attention. Across 3 studies, we investigated whether moral and emotional content captures our attention more than other content and if this may help explain why this content is more likely to go viral online. Using a combination of controlled lab experiments and nearly 50,000 political tweets, we found that moral and emotional content are prioritized in early visual attention more than neutral content, and that such attentional capture is associated with increased retweets during political conversations online. Furthermore, we found that the differences in attentional capture among moral and emotional stimuli could not be fully explained by differences in arousal. These studies suggest that attentional capture is 1 basic psychological process that helps explain the increased diffusion of moral and emotional content during political discourse on social media, and shed light on ways in which political leaders, disinformation profiteers, marketers, and activist organizations can spread moralized content by capitalizing on natural tendencies of our perceptual systems.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 756
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events [J].
Anderson, AK ;
Phelps, EA .
NATURE, 2001, 411 (6835) :305-309
[2]   Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness [J].
Anderson, AK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2005, 134 (02) :258-281
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETI
[4]   The self-importance of moral identity [J].
Aquino, K ;
Reed, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (06) :1423-1440
[5]   Blinded by emotion: Target misses follow attention capture by arousing distractors in RSVP [J].
Arnell, Karen M. ;
Killman, Kassandra V. ;
Fijavz, David .
EMOTION, 2007, 7 (03) :465-477
[6]   Justice Sensitivity and the Processing of Justice-related Information [J].
Baumert, Anna ;
Gollwitzer, Mario ;
Staubach, Miriam ;
Schmitt, Manfred .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2011, 25 (05) :386-397
[7]   What Makes Online Content Viral? [J].
Berger, Jonah ;
Milkman, Katherine L. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2012, 49 (02) :192-205
[8]  
Brady W. J., 2019, MAD MODEL MORAL CONT, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/pz9g6, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/PZ9G6]
[9]   An Ideological Asymmetry in the Diffusion of Moralized Content on Social Media Among Political Leaders [J].
Brady, William J. ;
Wills, Julian A. ;
Burkart, Dominic ;
Jost, John T. ;
Van Bavel, Jay J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2019, 148 (10) :1802-1813
[10]   How Effective Is Online Outrage? [J].
Brady, William J. ;
Crockett, M. J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (02) :79-80