Do Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Genetic Polymorphisms Modulate the Efficacy of Motor Cortex Plasticity Induced by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation? A Systematic Review

被引:4
作者
Sasaki, Ryoki [1 ,2 ]
Kojima, Sho [1 ,3 ]
Onishi, Hideaki [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Niigata Univ Hlth & Welf, Inst Human Movement & Med Sci, Niigata, Japan
[2] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Med Sch, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Niigata Univ Hlth & Welf, Dept Phys Therapy, Niigata, Japan
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2021年 / 15卷
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
brain-derived neurotrophic factor genotype; motor-evoked potential; primary motor cortex; transcranial magnetic stimulation; non-invasive brain stimulation; BDNF VAL66MET POLYMORPHISM; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; VAL(66)MET POLYMORPHISM; MET-ALLELE; EXCITABILITY; ASSOCIATION; THICKNESS; GENOTYPE;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2021.742373
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Techniques of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) of the human primary motor cortex (M1) are widely used in basic and clinical research to induce neural plasticity. The induction of neural plasticity in the M1 may improve motor performance ability in healthy individuals and patients with motor deficit caused by brain disorders. However, several recent studies revealed that various NIBS techniques yield high interindividual variability in the response, and that the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) genotype (i.e., Val/Val and Met carrier types) may be a factor contributing to this variability. Here, we conducted a systematic review of all published studies that investigated the effects of the BDNF genotype on various forms of NIBS techniques applied to the human M1. The motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes elicited by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which can evaluate M1 excitability, were investigated as the main outcome. A total of 1,827 articles were identified, of which 17 (facilitatory NIBS protocol, 27 data) and 10 (inhibitory NIBS protocol, 14 data) were included in this review. More than two-thirds of the data (70.4-78.6%) on both NIBS protocols did not show a significant genotype effect of NIBS on MEP changes. Conversely, most of the remaining data revealed that the Val/Val type is likely to yield a greater MEP response after NIBS than the Met carrier type in both NIBS protocols (21.4-25.9%). Finally, to aid future investigation, we discuss the potential effect of the BDNF genotype based on mechanisms and methodological issues.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [31] Lack of an association of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and plasma BDNF with hippocampal volume and memory
    Kim, Ana
    Fagan, Anne M.
    Goate, Alison M.
    Benzinger, Tammie L. S.
    Morris, John C.
    Head, Denise
    [J]. COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 15 (03) : 625 - 643
  • [32] BDNF val66met polymorphism is associated with modified experience-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex
    Kleim, Jeffrey A.
    Chan, Sheila
    Pringle, Erin
    Schallert, Kellan
    Procaccio, Vincent
    Jimenez, Richard
    Cramer, Steven C.
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 9 (06) : 735 - 737
  • [33] Interaction of Motor Training and Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Modulating Motor Cortical Plasticity: Influence of BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism
    Lee, Mina
    Kim, Song E.
    Kim, Won Sup
    Lee, Jungyeun
    Yoo, Hye Kyung
    Park, Kee-Duk
    Choi, Kyoung-Gyu
    Jeong, Seon-Yong
    Kim, Byung Gon
    Lee, Hyang Woon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):
  • [34] Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability
    Liebetanz, D
    Nitsche, MA
    Tergau, F
    Paulus, W
    [J]. BRAIN, 2002, 125 : 2238 - 2247
  • [35] A Preliminary Comparison of Motor Learning Across Different Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms Shows No Consistent Modulations
    Lopez-Alonso, Virginia
    Liew, Sook-Lei
    del Olmo, Miguel Fernandez
    Cheeran, Binith
    Sandrini, Marco
    Abet, Mitsunari
    Cohen, Leonardo G.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [36] Relationship Between Non-invasive Brain Stimulation-induced Plasticity and Capacity for Motor Learning
    Lopez-Alonso, Virginia
    Cheeran, Binith
    Fernandez-del-Olmo, Miguel
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (06) : 1209 - 1219
  • [37] Inter-individual Variability in Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms
    Lopez-Alonso, Virginia
    Cheeran, Binith
    Rio-Rodriguez, Dan
    Fernandez-del-Olmo, Miguel
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2014, 7 (03) : 372 - 380
  • [38] BDNF and LTP-/LTD-like plasticity of the primary motor cortex in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome
    Marsili, L.
    Suppa, A.
    Di Stasio, F.
    Belvisi, D.
    Upadhyay, N.
    Berardelli, I.
    Pasquini, M.
    Petrucci, S.
    Ginevrino, M.
    Fabbrini, G.
    Cardona, F.
    Defazio, G.
    Berardelli, A.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 235 (03) : 841 - 850
  • [39] Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor - A Major Player in Stimulation-Induced Homeostatic Metaplasticity of Human Motor Cortex?
    Mastroeni, Claudia
    Bergmann, Til Ole
    Rizzo, Vincenzo
    Ritter, Christoph
    Klein, Christine
    Pohlmann, Ines
    Brueggemann, Norbert
    Quartarone, Angelo
    Siebner, Hartwig Roman
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):
  • [40] A single bout of aerobic exercise promotes motor cortical neuroplasticity
    McDonnell, Michelle N.
    Buckley, Jonathan D.
    Opie, George M.
    Ridding, Michael C.
    Semmler, John G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 114 (09) : 1174 - 1182