Exploring differences in empirical time preference rates for health: An application of meta-regression

被引:10
作者
Asenso-Boadi, Francis
Peters, Tim J. [2 ]
Coast, Joanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Serv Management Ctr, Hlth Econ Facil, Birmingham B15 2RT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Community Based Med, Primary Care Hlth Serv Res, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
关键词
time preference; discounting; meta-regression;
D O I
10.1002/hec.1256
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Estimated time preference rates are extremely varied, with many rates being extremely high. Reviewing empirical studies without quantitative synthesis of their findings is largely unhelpful in determining how rates vary according to different factors. This study therefore explores the use of meta-regression techniques to combine available evidence to draw reliable conclusions about the factors influencing empirical time preference rates. Papers reporting empirically derived time preference rates related to health and health-care programmes were selected. Included were papers presenting all of. a mean time preference rate; information allowing derivation of standard errors; and one or more covariates. Appropriate data were derived from only eight of the 16 papers reporting empirical time preference rates. Meta-regression indicated that there were statistically significant relationships between mean time preference rates and: (a) delay period on a log scale; (b) whether the outcome question related to a gain or a loss. There were a number of limitations related to the use of meta-regression in this area, including difficulties in extracting appropriate data from the original studies, and the extent to which the original studies provide fully deliberated estimates of time preference. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 248
页数:14
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] ACHARYA AK, 2001, RETHINKING DISCOUNTI
  • [2] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470693926
  • [4] BAUCELLS M, 1999, DECISIONS OPERATIONS
  • [5] Time preference for health: A test of stationarity versus decreasing timing aversion
    Bleichrodt, H
    Johannesson, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 45 (02) : 265 - 282
  • [6] BOMMIER A, 2001, LEA0106 INED
  • [7] The discount rate in the economic evaluation of prevention: a thought experiment
    Bonneux, L
    Birnie, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 55 (02) : 123 - 125
  • [8] The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36
    Brazier, J
    Roberts, J
    Deverill, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) : 271 - 292
  • [9] BROOME J, 1993, DISCOUNTING FUTURE
  • [10] Discounting in decision making: the consistency argument revisited empirically
    Brouwer, WBF
    van Exel, NJA
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2004, 67 (02) : 187 - 194