Higher co-moments and asset pricing on London Stock Exchange

被引:29
作者
Kostakis, Alexandros [1 ]
Muhammad, Kashif [2 ]
Siganos, Antonios [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Management, Liverpool L69 7ZH, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Econ Div, Sch Business, Glasgow G12 8RT, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Accounting & Finance Div, Sch Business, Glasgow G12 8RT, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Asset pricing; Coskewness; Cokurtosis; London Stock Exchange; RISK; PREFERENCE; SKEWNESS; EQUILIBRIUM; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; VALUATION; RETURN; ORDER; BETA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the asset pricing implications of preferences over the higher moments of returns' distributions. We show that in a market populated by risk-averse, prudent and temperate investors, firms whose returns exhibit negative coskewness or positive cokurtosis should yield higher premia relative to counterpart firms with positive coskewness and negative cokurtosis respectively. These theoretical predictions are empirically tested using a comprehensive dataset of shares listed on the London Stock Exchange during the period 1986-2008. Our empirical results confirm that coskewness and cokurtosis premia are genuinely priced in the UK market, over and above what covariance risk, size, value and momentum factors can explain. We also show that a theoretically motivated, higher co-moment asset pricing model has significant explanatory ability over the cross-section of coskewness and cokurtosis portfolio returns. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 922
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Why stocks may disappoint [J].
Ang, A ;
Bekaert, G ;
Liu, J .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 76 (03) :471-508
[2]   Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness [J].
Boyer, Brian ;
Mitton, Todd ;
Vorkink, Keith .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2010, 23 (01) :169-202
[3]  
Campbell J. Y., 2002, STRATEGIC ASSET ALLO
[4]   Bad beta, good beta [J].
Campbell, JY ;
Vuolteenaho, T .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (05) :1249-1275
[5]   On persistence in mutual fund performance [J].
Carhart, MM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (01) :57-82
[6]  
Cochrane JH, 2005, ASSET PRICING, P1
[7]   Portfolio insurance and prospect theory investors: Popularity and optimal design of capital protected financial products [J].
Dichtl, Hubert ;
Drobetz, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (07) :1683-1697
[8]   The performance of hedge fund strategies and the asymmetry of return distributions [J].
Ding, Bill ;
Shawky, Hany A. .
EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 13 (02) :309-331
[9]   Nonlinear pricing kernels, kurtosis preference, and evidence from the cross section of equity returns [J].
Dittmar, RF .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (01) :369-403
[10]   Changes in background risk and risk taking behavior [J].
Eeckhoudt, L ;
Gollier, C ;
Schlesinger, H .
ECONOMETRICA, 1996, 64 (03) :683-689