Modelling of Institutional Capacity within Study of Energy Transition Dynamics

被引:0
作者
Farenhorste-Mikane, Ieva [1 ]
Bazbauers, Gatis [1 ]
Blumberga, Andra [1 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [1 ]
Ijabs, Ivars [2 ]
机构
[1] Riga Tech Univ, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, Azenes Iela 12-1, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
[2] Univ Latvia, Fac Social Sci, Lauvas St 4, LV-1019 Riga, Latvia
关键词
Climate and energy policy; critical materials; renewable energy; social acceptance; sustainable energy systems; system dynamics modelling; COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT; AESTHETIC IMPACT; WIND ENERGY; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.2478/rtuect-2021-0090
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Institutional capacity is enabling environment for interactions between individuals and organizations. Understanding the changes required regarding the institutional capacity is needed to remove barriers and stimulate transition to sustainable energy systems. The aim of this study was to identify those barriers to understand what type of changes of the institutional capacity is required. Review of publications was done with focus on the three critical domains for clean energy transition - social acceptance, climate and energy policy and critical materials. In result, the most important aspects of the institutional capacity that form the barriers as well as stimulus in the three domains were identified. Causal loop diagram providing a systemic viewpoint on the important elements and interactions within the mentioned three domains is presented. Results of the study can be used for system dynamics model of energy transition.
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1204
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] A human-centered design approach to evaluating factors in residential solar PV adoption: A survey of homeowners in California and Massachusetts
    Bao, Qifang
    Sinitskaya, Ekaterina
    Gomez, Kelley J.
    MacDonald, Erin F.
    Yang, Maria C.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 151 (151) : 503 - 513
  • [2] Climate-friendly but socially rejected energy-transition pathways: The integration of techno-economic and socio-technical approaches in the Nordic-Baltic region
    Bolwig, Simon
    Bolkesjo, Torjus Folsland
    Klitkou, Antje
    Lund, Peter D.
    Bergaentzle, Claire
    Borch, Kristian
    Olsen, Ole Jess
    Kirkerud, Jon Gustav
    Chen, Yi-kuang
    Gunkel, Philipp Andreas
    Skytte, Klaus
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 67
  • [3] Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility
    Bolwig, Simon
    Bazbauers, Gatis
    Klitkou, Antje
    Lund, Peter D.
    Blumberga, Andra
    Gravelsins, Armands
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 101 : 440 - 452
  • [4] Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review
    Cohen, Jed J.
    Reichl, Johannes
    Schmidthaler, Michael
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 76 : 4 - 9
  • [5] Supporting climate policy with effective energy modelling: A perspective on the varying technical capacity of South Africa, China, Germany and the United States
    Dioha, Michael O.
    Abraham-Dukuma, Magnus C.
    Bogado, Natalia
    Okpaleke, Francis N.
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 69
  • [6] Chains of trust: Energy justice, public engagement, and the first offshore wind farm in the United States
    Dwyer, Joseph
    Bidwell, David
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 47 : 166 - 176
  • [7] Erickson L E., 2019, Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Improving Air Quality, P11, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781351116589-2
  • [8] European Commission, 2019, The European Green Deal
  • [9] European Commission. Commission of European Communities, 2017, 490 COM EUR COMM, P1
  • [10] Barriers to onshore wind energy implementation: A systematic review
    Farkat Diogenes, Jamil Ramsi
    Claro, Joao
    Rodrigues, Jose Coelho
    Loureiro, Manuel Valentim
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 60