Effects of responsive stimulation and nutrition interventions on children's development and growth at age 4 years in a disadvantaged population in Pakistan: a longitudinal follow-up of a cluster-randomised factorial effectiveness trial

被引:139
作者
Yousafzai, Aisha K. [1 ]
Obradovic, Jelena [2 ]
Rasheed, Muneera A. [1 ]
Rizvi, Arjumand [1 ]
Portilla, Ximena A. [2 ]
Tirado-Strayer, Nicole [2 ]
Siyal, Saima [1 ]
Memon, Uzma [1 ]
机构
[1] Aga Khan Univ, Dept Paediat & Child Hlth, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
[2] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH | 2016年 / 4卷 / 08期
关键词
EARLY-CHILDHOOD; MICRONUTRIENT SUPPLEMENTATION; PSYCHOSOCIAL STIMULATION; PARENTING INTERVENTION; COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENT; STUNTED CHILDREN; YOUNG-CHILDREN; MOTOR FUNCTION; COUNTRIES; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30100-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background A previous study in Pakistan assessed the effectiveness of delivering responsive stimulation and enhanced nutrition interventions to young children. Responsive stimulation significantly improved children's cognitive, language, and motor development at 2 years of age. Both interventions significantly improved parenting skills, with responsive stimulation showing larger effects. In this follow-up study, we investigated whether interventions had benefits on children's healthy development and care at 4 years of age. Methods We implemented a follow-up study of the initial, community-based cluster-randomised effectiveness trial, which was conducted through the Lady Health Worker programme in Sindh, Pakistan. We re-enrolled 1302 mother-child dyads (87% of the 1489 dyads in the original enrolment) for assessment when the child was 4 years of age. The children were originally randomised in the following groups: nutrition education and multiple micronutrient powders (enhanced nutrition; n=311), responsive stimulation (n=345), combined responsive stimulation and enhanced nutrition (n=315), and routine health and nutrition services (control; n=331). The data collection team were masked to the allocated intervention. The original enrolment period included children born in the study area between April 1, 2009, and March 31, 2010, if they were up to 2 . 5 months old without signs of severe impairments. The primary endpoints for children were development and growth at 4 years of age. Interventions were given in monthly group sessions and in home visits. The primary endpoint for mothers was wellbeing and caregiving knowledge, practices, and skills when the child was 4 years of age. Analysis was by intention to treat. The original trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00715936. Findings 1302 mother-child dyads were re-enrolled between Jan 1, 2013, and March 31, 2013, all of whom were followed up at 4 years of age. Children who received responsive stimulation (with or without enhanced nutrition) had significantly higher cognition, language, and motor skills at 4 years of age than children who did not receive responsive stimulation. For children who received responsive stimulation plus enhanced nutrition, effect sizes (Cohen's d) were 0.1 for IQ (mean difference from control 1.2, 95% CI -0.3 to 2.7), 0.3 for executive functioning (0.18, -0.07 to 0.29), 0.5 for pre-academic skills (7.53, 5.14 to 9.92) and 0.2 for pro-social behaviours (0.08, 0.03 to 0.13). For children who received responsive stimulation alone, effect sizes were 0.1 for IQ (mean difference with controls 1.7, -0.3 to 3.7), 0.3 for executive functioning (0.17, 0.07 to 0.27), 0.2 for pre-academic skills (3.86, 1.41 to 6.31), and 0.2 for pro-social behaviours (0.07, 0.02 to 0.12). Enhanced nutrition improved child motor development, with effect size of 0.2 for responsive stimulation plus enhanced nutrition (0.56, -0.03 to 1.15), and for enhanced nutrition alone (0.82, 0.18 to 1.46). Mothers who received responsive stimulation (with or without enhanced nutrition) had significantly better responsive caregiving behaviours at 4 years of child age than those who did not receive intervention. Effect size was 0.3 for responsive stimulation plus enhanced nutrition (1.95, 0.75 to 3.15) and 0.2 for responsive stimulation (2.01, 0.74 to 3.28). The caregiving environment had a medium effect size of 0.3 for all interventions (responsive stimulation plus enhanced nutrition 2.99, 1.50 to 4.48; responsive stimulation alone 2.82, 1.21 to 4.43; enhanced nutrition 3.52, 1.70 to 5.34). Interpretation Responsive stimulation delivered in a community health service can improve child development and care, 2 years after the end of intervention. Future analyses of these data are needed to identify which children and families benefit more or less over time. Copyright (C) Yousafzai et al. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license.
引用
收藏
页码:E548 / E558
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Global Health and Development in Early Childhood
    Aboud, Frances E.
    Yousafzai, Aisha K.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 66, 2015, 66 : 433 - 457
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, ANTHROPOMETRIC INDIC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, WECHSLER PRESCHOOL P
  • [4] Bracken B.A., 2007, Bracken school readiness assessment, V3rd
  • [5] Child Development in Developing Countries: Child Rights and Policy Implications
    Britto, Pia Rebello
    Ulkuer, Nurper
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 83 (01) : 92 - 103
  • [6] Integrating a Parenting Intervention With Routine Primary Health Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial
    Chang, Susan M.
    Grantham-McGregor, Sally M.
    Powell, Christine A.
    Vera-Hernandez, Marcos
    Lopez-Boo, Florencia
    Baker-Henningham, Helen
    Walker, Susan P.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2015, 136 (02) : 272 - 280
  • [7] Prenatal Micronutrient Supplementation and Intellectual and Motor Function in Early School-aged Children in Nepal
    Christian, Parul
    Murray-Kolb, Laura E.
    Khatry, Subarna K.
    Katz, Joanne
    Schaefer, Barbara A.
    Cole, Pamela M.
    LeClerq, Steven C.
    Tielsch, James M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (24): : 2716 - 2723
  • [8] Child development in developing countries 3 - Strategies to avoid the loss of developmental potential in more than 200 million children in the developing world
    Engle, Patrice L.
    Black, Maureen M.
    Behrman, Jere R.
    Cabral de Mello, Meena
    Gertler, Paul J.
    Kapiriri, Lydia
    Martorell, Reynaldo
    Eming Young, Mary
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 369 (9557) : 229 - 242
  • [9] Child Development 2 Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries
    Engle, Patrice L.
    Fernald, Lia C. H.
    Alderman, Harold
    Behrman, Jere
    O'Gara, Chloe
    Yousafzai, Aisha
    de Mello, Meena Cabral
    Hidrobo, Melissa
    Ulkuer, Nurper
    Ertem, Ilgi
    Iltus, Selim
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 378 (9799) : 1339 - 1353
  • [10] Promoting child development at sick-child visits: A controlled trial
    Ertem, IO
    Atay, G
    Bingoler, BE
    Dogan, DG
    Bayhan, A
    Sarica, D
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2006, 118 (01) : E124 - E131