A hybrid resilient static power system expansion planning framework

被引:10
|
作者
Firoozjaee, Mahdi Golchoob [1 ]
Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad Kazem [1 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Expected demand not served; Generation and transmission expansion; Planning; Microgrids; Monte Carlo simulation; Resilience index; EXTREME WEATHER; MICROGRIDS; STRATEGY; METRICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107234
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A power system developed solely based on reliability metrics is not expected to appropriately respond to the severe events' effects. Also, reinforcement of existing components may be very expensive if practical. One of the measures taken to have the proper tools to deal with a severe event is to consider the resilience index during generation and transmission expansion planning (GTEP). Microgrids can also increase the power system's resilience and reduce planning costs with the resilience index. In this paper, a hybrid resilient static framework for GTEP is presented, determining the microgrid' optimal penetration rate. The proposed framework is a twostage framework that, in the first stage, the GTEP problem is solved. In the second stage, the results of planning are examined by the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) to calculate the expected demand not served (EDNS) as the representative of the resilience index. For reaching the desired resilience, investment costs in the planning stage should be increased and used as a constraint in the next step. This process is repeated for each predetermined microgrids' penetration rate. The effect of the event on the transmission lines is modeled using the notion of fragility curve. In this framework, there is also the ability to use reinforced lines during GTEP as a planning option. The simulations performed on the two sample networks show the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A two-stage simulation-based framework for optimal resilient generation and transmission expansion planning
    Firoozjaee, Mahdi Golchoob
    Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad Kazem
    IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2022, 16 (21) : 4273 - 4290
  • [32] A framework for hybrid planning
    Garagnani, M
    RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS XXI, 2005, : 214 - 227
  • [33] Power distribution system planning framework (A comprehensive review)
    Dashti, Reza
    Rouhandeh, Mojtaba
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2023, 50
  • [34] Static Transmission Network Expansion Planning of Electric Power Systems using the Firefly Optimization
    Mendonca, Isabela M.
    Poubel, Raphael P. B.
    Junior, Ivo C. S.
    Oliveira, Edimar J.
    Marcato, Andre L. M.
    Oliveira, Leonardo W.
    2013 IEEE GRENOBLE POWERTECH (POWERTECH), 2013,
  • [35] Composite power system expansion planning considering outage cost
    Choi, Jaeseok
    Tran, Trungtinh
    Mount, T. D.
    Thomas, R.
    2007 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-10, 2007, : 2958 - +
  • [36] Towards CSP technology modeling in power system expansion planning
    Norambuena-Guzman, Valentina
    Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo
    Hernandez-Moris, Catalina
    Cerda, Maria Teresa
    Flores-Quiroz, Angela
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 364
  • [37] Energy storage system expansion planning in power systems: a review
    Sheibani, Mohammad Reza
    Yousefi, Gholam Reza
    Latify, Mohammad Amin
    Dolatabadi, Sarineh Hacopian
    IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2018, 12 (11) : 1203 - 1221
  • [38] Power system expansion planning of Oman in new restructured environment
    De Bhowmick, A. K.
    A-Khusaibi, Thani M. S.
    2007 AUSTRALASIAN UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-2, 2007, : 42 - 47
  • [39] Multiobjective generation expansion planning considering power system adequacy
    Aghaei, Jamshid
    Akbari, Mohammad Amin
    Roosta, Alireza
    Baharvandi, Amir
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2013, 102 : 8 - 19
  • [40] Reliability-Constrained Robust Power System Expansion Planning
    Dehghan, Shahab
    Amjady, Nima
    Conejo, Antonio J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (03) : 2383 - 2392