Exploring the strategic environmental assessment (SEA) process behaviour using sensitivity analysis

被引:1
作者
Onyango, Vincent [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Sch Environm, Town & Reg Planning, Dundee, Scotland
关键词
Strategic environmental assessment (SEA); process behaviour; SEA elements; cybernetics; sensitivity analysis; England SEA; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; DEVELOPMENT PLANS; SUSTAINABILITY; INTEGRATION; CONTEXT; SYSTEMS; POWER; UK;
D O I
10.1080/14615517.2016.1140990
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper reflects on the results from a study that set out to model the behaviour of the strategic environmental assessment (SEA) process as it delivers environmental integration. It applied sensitivity analysis to the English SEA system, whilst viewing the SEA process as composed of a complex interaction of individual elements; through 'inputs and outputs' underpinned by negative and positive feedback loops that self-regulate the achievement of environmental integration. The study revealed at least five behavioural characteristics at the level of individual elements based on their relative dominance and consequent influence in process activities. At systemic process level, at least three key behavioural tendencies were identified. Overall, the process was poor in self-regulation, hampered by a lack of adequate feedback mechanisms. No single element or group of elements was critical in shaping process response and self-regulation towards delivering a consistent level of environmental integration.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 175
页数:16
相关论文
共 116 条
[11]   The paradox of strategic environmental assessment [J].
Bidstrup, Morten ;
Hansen, Anne Merrild .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2014, 47 :29-35
[12]  
Bina O., 2011, Handbook of Strategic Environmental Assessment, P445
[13]   Context and systems: Thinking more broadly about effectiveness in Strategic Environmental Assessment in China [J].
Bina, Olivia .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 42 (04) :717-733
[14]  
Bojo J, 2004, 2 WORLD BANK
[15]  
Bonifazi Alessandro, 2011, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, V13, P9, DOI 10.1142/S1464333211003778
[16]  
Brown A.L., 2000, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V18, P183, DOI [10.3152/147154600781767385, DOI 10.3152/147154600781767385]
[17]  
Camerer C. F., 2003, Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.SOCEC.2003.10.009, 10.1016/j.socec.2003.10.009]
[18]  
Caratti P, 2004, ANAL STRATEGIC ENV A, P16, DOI [10.4337/9781845421533, DOI 10.4337/9781845421533]
[19]   The Strategic Environment Assessment bibliographic network: A quantitative literature review analysis [J].
Caschili, Simone ;
De Montis, Andrea ;
Ganciu, Amedeo ;
Ledda, Antonio ;
Barra, Mario .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2014, 47 :14-28
[20]   The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory [J].
Cashmore, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2004, 24 (04) :403-426