Stress based prediction of formability and failure in incremental sheet forming

被引:16
作者
Haque, Md Ziaul [1 ]
Yoon, Jeong Whan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Fac Sci Engn & Technol, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Fac Sci Engn & Built Environm, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[3] Univ Aveiro, TEMA, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
Stress-based forming limit; Necking; Failure; ALUMINUM-ALLOY SHEETS; YIELD FUNCTION; CRITERION; STRAIN; PART;
D O I
10.1007/s12289-015-1237-8
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A strain-based forming limit criterion is widely used in sheet-metal forming industry to predict necking. However, this criterion is usually valid when the strain path is linear throughout the deformation process [1]. Strain path in incremental sheet forming is often found to be severely nonlinear throughout the deformation history. Therefore, the practice of using a strain-based forming limit criterion often leads to erroneous assessments of formability and failure prediction. On the other hands, stress-based forming limit is insensitive against any changes in the strain path and hence it is first used to model the necking limit in incremental sheet forming. The stress-based forming limit is also combined with the fracture limit based on maximum shear stress criterion to show necking and fracture together. A derivation for a general mapping method from strain-based FLC to stress-based FLC using a non-quadratic yield function has been made. Simulation model is evaluated for a single point incremental forming using AA 6022-T43, and checked the accuracy against experiments. By using the path-independent necking and fracture limits, it is able to explain the deformation mechanism successfully in incremental sheet forming. The proposed model has given a good scientific basis for the development of ISF under nonlinear strain path and its usability over conventional sheet forming process as well.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 421
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets - part 1: theory [J].
Barlat, F ;
Brem, JC ;
Yoon, JW ;
Chung, K ;
Dick, RE ;
Lege, DJ ;
Pourgoghrat, F ;
Choi, SH ;
Chu, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 2003, 19 (09) :1297-1319
[2]   Linear transfomation-based anisotropic yield functions [J].
Barlat, F ;
Aretz, H ;
Yoon, JW ;
Karabin, ME ;
Brem, JC ;
Dick, RE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 2005, 21 (05) :1009-1039
[3]  
Esteban B.M., 2008, AUTOMOTIVE METALS WR, P24
[4]   CALCULATIONS OF FORMING LIMIT DIAGRAMS FOR CHANGING STRAIN PATHS [J].
GRAF, AF ;
HOSFORD, WF .
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A-PHYSICAL METALLURGY AND MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1993, 24 (11) :2497-2501
[5]  
Haque M.Z., 2013, AIP P, V1567, P816
[6]  
Hong S.H., 2008, NUMISHEET2008, P105
[7]   GENERALIZED ISOTROPIC YIELD CRITERION [J].
HOSFORD, WF .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS, 1972, 39 (02) :607-&
[8]  
Kleemola H.J., 1977, Sheet Metal Ind, P591
[9]  
Kuwabara T., 2003, P PLAST 03, P388
[10]   Sheet metal formability analysis for anisotropic materials under non-proportional loading [J].
Stoughton, TB ;
Yoon, JW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 47 (12) :1972-2002