Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes

被引:54
作者
Benndorf, Matthias [1 ]
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. [1 ]
Vag, Tibor [1 ]
Gajda, Mieczyslaw [2 ]
Runnebaum, Ingo B. [3 ]
Kaiser, Werner A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Jena, Inst Pathol, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Jena, Clin Gynaecol, D-07740 Jena, Germany
关键词
MRI; comparative studies; diagnostic accuracy; breast; specificity; HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUES; RESONANCE; CANCER; ULTRASOUND; SURVEILLANCE; WOMEN; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.3109/02841851.2010.497164
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Reports on the specificity of breast MRI are heterogeneous, depending on the respective setting of the performed study. Purpose: To retrospectively estimate the sensitivity and especially the specificity of breast MRI in the non-screening setting as an adjunct to mammography sorted by breast density and to estimate the accuracy of breast MRI in cases rated BI-RADS 0 and 3 mammographically. Material and Methods: A total of 216 consecutive patients with referral to breast MRI and previously acquired mammography were enrolled in this analysis. Negative findings were followed up with a mean time of 26.7 months. The loss to follow-up was 10.8%. The single breast was regarded as the study subject (n = 399, 364 cases were eligible for calculation of diagnostic accuracy). BI-RADS 1 and 2 were rated as benign, 4 and 5 as malignant. BI-RADS 0 and 3 were analyzed separately. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from the normally approximated binomial distribution and taken to represent significant differences for the two imaging modalities if they did not overlap. Results: Among the study population, 62 malignant neoplasms were detected. For cases rated BI-RADS 1, 2, 4, and 5 (n = 251), the sensitivity of breast MRI was 95.7% (95% CI 89.9-100.0%) and 74.5% (95% CI 62.0-87.0%) for mammography, respectively. The specificity of breast MRI was 96.1% (95% CI 93.4-98.8%) and 92.2% (95% CI 88.5-95.9%) for mammography, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI did not depend on breast density. In cases rated BI-RADS 0, n = 57 (3, n = 56), breast MRI achieved a sensitivity of 100% (90.9%) and a specificity of 98.1% (88.9%). There was a significant (P < 0.01) accumulation of dense breast tissue (ACR IV) in breasts rated BI-RADS 0 in mammography. Breast MRI missed three malignant lesions, two of them being smaller than 3 mm. Conclusion: There is no rationale to criticize the low specificity of breast MRI when used as an adjunct to mammography. The independency of the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI from breast density makes it a worthwhile choice in mammographic BI-RADS 0 cases.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 721
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-2 - PREDICTIVE VALUES .4.
    ALTMAN, DG
    BLAND, JM
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6947) : 102 - 102
  • [2] BIRADS™ classification in mammography
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Ayadi, Salma
    Nguyen, Kim Van
    Vanel, Daniel
    Dromain, Clarisse
    Sigal, Robert
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 61 (02) : 192 - 194
  • [3] Bender R, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P946, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<946::AID-SIM2823>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-3
  • [5] Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer
    Berg, WA
    Gutierrez, L
    NessAiver, MS
    Carter, WB
    Bhargavan, M
    Lewis, RS
    Ioffe, OB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) : 830 - 849
  • [6] Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative
    Bossuyt, PM
    Reitsma, JB
    Bruns, DE
    Gatsonis, CA
    Glasziou, PP
    Irwig, LM
    Lijmer, JG
    Moher, D
    Rennie, D
    de Vet, HCW
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [7] Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
  • [8] Overall breast density in MR mammography -: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications in breast cancer
    Echevarria, JJ
    Martín, M
    Saiz, A
    Imaz, I
    Férnandez-Ruanova, B
    Martín, D
    López-Ruiz, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2006, 30 (01) : 140 - 147
  • [9] Screening for breast cancer
    Elmore, JG
    Armstrong, K
    Lehman, CD
    Fletcher, SW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (10): : 1245 - 1256
  • [10] Seminars in medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston - Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis
    Folkman, J
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (26) : 1757 - 1763