Using Different Single-Step Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Genomic Prediction on Body Measurement Traits in Pig

被引:49
作者
Song, Hailiang [1 ]
Zhang, Jinxin [1 ]
Zhang, Qin [1 ,2 ]
Ding, Xiangdong [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Natl Engn Lab Anim Breeding, Key Lab Anim Genet & Breeding,Minist Agr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Agr Univ, Shandong Prov Key Lab Anim Biotechnol & Dis Contr, Tai An, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
body measurement traits; pig; single-step GBLUP; two-trait model; cross-validation; GENETIC-PARAMETERS; REPRODUCTION TRAITS; UNIFIED APPROACH; FULL PEDIGREE; INFORMATION; SELECTION; WEIGHT; POPULATION; ANIMALS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2018.00730
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In genomic prediction, single-step method has been demonstrated to outperform multi-step methods. This study investigated the efficiency of genomic prediction for seven body measurement traits in Yorkshire population and simulated data using single-step method. For Yorkshire population, in total, 592 individuals were genotyped with Illumina PorcineSNP80 marker panel. We compared the prediction accuracy obtained from a traditional pedigree-based method (BLUP), a genomic BLUP (GBLUP) and a single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) through 20 replicates of 5-fold cross-validation (CV). In addition, we also compared the performance of two-trait ssGBLUP and single-trait ssGBLUP for the traits with different gradients of genetic correlation. Our results indicated the GBLUP method generally provided lower accuracies of prediction than BLUP and ssGBLUP methods, and the average standard deviation of unbiasedness was as large as 0.278. For single-step methods, the accuracies of ssGBLUP for seven body measurement traits ranged from 0.543 to 0.785, and the unbiasedness of ssGBLUP ranged from 0.834 to 1.026, respectively. ssGBLUP generally generated 1% on average higher prediction accuracy than traditional BLUP, the improvement of ssGBLUP and the performance of GBLUP was lower than expected mainly due to the small number of genotyped animals, it was further demonstrated by our simulation study. We simulated two traits with heritabilities 0.1, 0.3, and with high genetic correlation 0.7, our results also showed that the prediction accuracies were low for GBLUP compared with other three methods with different genotyped reference population sizes and the accuracies were improved with increasing the genotyped reference population size. However, the increase was small for ssGBLUP compared with BLUP when the genotyped reference population size was <500. Our results also demonstrated that the accuracies of genomic prediction can be further improved by implementing two-trait ssGBLUP model, the maximum gain on accuracy was 2 and 2.6% for trait of chest width compared to single-trait ssGBLUP and traditional BLUP, while the gain was decreased with the weakness of genetic correlation. Two-trait ssGBLUP even performed worse than single trait analysis in the scenario of low genetic correlation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Multiple trait genomic evaluation of conception rate in Holsteins [J].
Aguilar, I. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Wiggans, G. R. ;
Lawlor, T. J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (05) :2621-2624
[2]   Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score [J].
Aguilar, I. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Johnson, D. L. ;
Legarra, A. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Lawlor, T. J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (02) :743-752
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT J ADV RES
[4]   A Unified Approach to Genotype Imputation and Haplotype-Phase Inference for Large Data Sets of Trios and Unrelated Individuals [J].
Browning, Brian L. ;
Browning, Sharon R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2009, 84 (02) :210-223
[5]   Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods [J].
Calus, Mario P. L. ;
Veerkamp, Roel F. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
[6]  
Chang-hee Do,, 2014, Korean Journal of Agricultural Science, V41, P229, DOI 10.7744/cnujas.2014.41.3.229
[7]   Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens [J].
Chen, C. Y. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Aguilar, I. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Meuwissen, T. H. E. ;
Aggrey, S. E. ;
Wing, T. ;
Muir, W. M. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (01) :23-28
[8]   Complex trait analysis of gene expression uncovers polygenic and pleiotropic networks that modulate nervous system function [J].
Chesler, EJ ;
Lu, L ;
Shou, SM ;
Qu, YH ;
Gu, J ;
Wang, JT ;
Hsu, HC ;
Mountz, JD ;
Baldwin, NE ;
Langston, MA ;
Threadgill, DW ;
Manly, KF ;
Williams, RW .
NATURE GENETICS, 2005, 37 (03) :233-242
[9]   Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs [J].
Christensen, O. F. ;
Madsen, P. ;
Nielsen, B. ;
Ostersen, T. ;
Su, G. .
ANIMAL, 2012, 6 (10) :1565-1571
[10]   Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped [J].
Christensen, Ole F. ;
Lund, Mogens S. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2010, 42