Modelling Forest Species Using Lidar-Derived Metrics of Forest Canopy Gaps

被引:2
作者
Lombard, Leighton [1 ]
Ismail, Riyad [1 ,2 ]
Poona, Nitesh K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Sappi Forests, Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS | 2020年 / 9卷 / 01期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION; INDIVIDUAL TREES; MULTIRESOLUTION SEGMENTATION; INTENSITY; FEATURES; IMAGERY; PARAMETERS; VARIABLES; BIOMASS; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.4314/sajg.v9i1.3
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
LiDAR intensity and texture features have reported high accuracies for discriminating forest species, particularly with the utility of the random forest (RF) algorithm. To date, limited studies has utilized LiDAR-derived forest gap information to assist in forest species discrimination. In this study, LiDAR intensity and texture features were extracted from forest canopy gaps to discriminate Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus dunnii within a forest plantation. Additionally, LiDAR intensity and texture information was extracted for both canopy gaps and forest canopy and utilized for species discrimination. Using LiDAR intensity and texture information extracted for both canopy gap and forest canopy, resulted in a model accuracy of 94.74% (KHAT = 0.88). Using only canopy gap information, the RF model obtained an overall accuracy of 90.91% (KHAT = 0.81). The results highlight the potential for using canopy gap information for commercial species discrimination and mapping.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 43
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Prediction of Dominant Forest Tree Species Using QuickBird and Environmental Data
    Abdollahnejad, Azadeh
    Panagiotidis, Dimitrios
    Joybari, Shaban Shataee
    Surovy, Peter
    [J]. FORESTS, 2017, 8 (02):
  • [2] Employing ground and satellite-based QuickBird data and random forest to discriminate five tree species in a Southern African Woodland
    Adelabu, Samuel
    Dube, Timothy
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 30 (04) : 457 - 471
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, FORESTRY APPL AIRBOR
  • [4] Mapping wild pear trees (Pyrus bourgaeana) in Mediterranean forest using high-resolution QuickBird satellite imagery
    Arenas-Castro, S.
    Julien, Y.
    Jimenez-Munoz, J. C.
    Sobrino, J. A.
    Fernandez-Haeger, J.
    Jordano-Barbudo, D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 34 (9-10) : 3376 - 3396
  • [5] Barilotti A, 2009, LASER SCANNING
  • [6] Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions
    Belgiu, Mariana
    Dragut, Lucian
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 : 24 - 31
  • [7] Comparing supervised and unsupervised multiresolution segmentation approaches for extracting buildings from very high resolution imagery
    Belgiu, Mariana
    Dragut, Lucian
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 96 : 67 - 75
  • [8] Can remote sensing of land cover improve species distribution modelling?
    Bradley, Bethany A.
    Fleishman, Erica
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2008, 35 (07) : 1158 - 1159
  • [9] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [10] Predicting live and dead tree basal area of bark beetle affected forests from discrete-return lidar
    Bright, Benjamin C.
    Hudak, Andrew T.
    McGaughey, Robert
    Andersen, Hans-Erik
    Negron, Jose
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 39 : S99 - S111