CenteringPregnancy: An Integrative Literature Review

被引:46
作者
Manant, Annette [1 ,2 ]
Dodgson, Joan E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hawaii Pacific Univ, Kaneohe, HI 96744 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[3] Univ Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
CenteringPregnancy; centering pregnancy; prenatal care; pregnancy; group prenatal care; group model of prenatal care; GROUP PRENATAL-CARE; CHILDBIRTH EDUCATION; PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1542-2011.2010.00021.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Methods: An integrative literature review methodology was used to assess the CenteringPregnancy literature published between 1994 and 2009. Results: The sample consisted of 26 articles (14 narrative descriptions, 10 quantitative studies, 1 mixed methods study, and 1 qualitative study) published predominantly in nursing and midwifery journals. The majority of quantitative studies were exploratory or quasi-experimental and longitudinal designs with the exception of 1 large, federally funded, randomized, controlled trial. Variables were individual and community level outcomes, which were not uniformly operationally defined or measured consistently across studies. Significant results for prenatal care attendance rates, adequate prenatal care, and breastfeeding rates were reported in a number of studies. Other results were often mixed or nonsignificant. Discussion: Positive outcomes for the CenteringPregnancy model have been suggested by research findings to date but require more systematic approaches to developing knowledge about the factors inherent in this model that promote participant behavior changes, which lead to better perinatal outcomes as well as circumstances that maximize the effectiveness of this model. Areas for improving the strength of the evidence are discussed. Building consistently demonstrated relationships across studies is essential for creating the evidence base on which practice decisions can be made. Further research is required for developing clarity and understanding about this model's effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 102
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Andrist L, 1997, Nurs Inq, V4, P268, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1800.1997.tb00113.x
[2]   Childbirth education and birth plans [J].
Bailey, Joanne Motino ;
Crane, Patricia ;
Nugent, Clark. E. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 35 (03) :497-+
[3]  
BALDWIN KA, 2003, EFFECT CTR PRENATAL
[4]   Comparison of selected outcomes of ConteringPregnancy versus traditional prenatal care [J].
Baldwin, Karen A. .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2006, 51 (04) :266-272
[5]   HUMAN AGENCY IN SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY [J].
BANDURA, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1989, 44 (09) :1175-1184
[6]  
Bloom K.C., 2005, Clinical Excellence for Nurse Practitioners, V9, P213
[7]  
Carlson NS, 2006, MCN-AM J MATERN-CHIL, V31, P218
[8]  
Chinn P.L., 2004, INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE, VSixth
[9]   The theoretical basis for nurse-midwifery practice in the United States: A critical analysis of three theories [J].
Cragin, L .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2004, 49 (05) :381-389
[10]  
Garrard J., 2007, Health sciences literature review made easy