Assessing the Impact of Participatory Extension Programme Membership on Farm Business Performance in Northern Ireland

被引:4
作者
Adenuga, Adewale H. [1 ]
Jack, Claire [1 ]
Ashfield, Austen [1 ]
Wallace, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Agri Food & Biosci Inst, Econ Res Branch, 18a Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 10期
关键词
impact assessment; participatory extension; conditional difference-in-differences; matching; Business Development Groups; Northern Ireland; PROPENSITY SCORE; FIELD SCHOOLS; ENDOGENEITY; EMPLOYMENT; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture11100949
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the impact of membership of the Business Development Groups (BDG), a participatory extension programme in Northern Ireland on the economic performance of participating farmers for dairy and sheep enterprise groups. The study employs the conditional difference-in-differences approach which combines a non-parametric matching estimator with a difference-in-differences analytical technique to obtain a credible best-estimates of the causal effect of BDG membership on farmers' economic performance assuming that BDG participation is as good as random after controlling for observable farm characteristics and that the parallel trends assumption holds between BDG participants and non-participants. The results of the analyses showed that membership in the BDG programme has a statistically significant impact on the economic performance of participating farmers. Specifically, the results showed that farmers who are members of the dairy and sheep BDGs increased their gross margin by 109.10 pound and 17.10 pound per head respectively compared to farmers that are non-members of the BDGs. The results of the study provide robust evidence to inform policy development around the area of participatory extension programmes. It also supports the design of efficient agricultural education and extension systems that incorporates the ideas of the farmers themselves through peer-to-peer learning thereby maximising the economic and social benefits accruable from such programmes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Endogeneity: How Failure to Correct for it can Cause Wrong Inferences and Some Remedies [J].
Abdallah, Wissam ;
Goergen, Marc ;
O'Sullivan, Noel .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 26 (04) :791-804
[2]  
Adenuga A.H., 2016, Appl. Trop. Agric., V21, P24
[3]   Analysis of the effect of alternative agri-environmental policy instruments on production performance and nitrogen surplus of representative dairy farms [J].
Adenuga, Adewale Henry ;
Davis, John ;
Hutchinson, George ;
Patton, Myles ;
Donnellan, Trevor .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 184
[4]   Does extension work? Impacts of a program to assist limited-resource farmers in Virginia [J].
Akobundu, E ;
Alwang, J ;
Essel, A ;
Norton, GW ;
Tegene, A .
REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (03) :361-372
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
[6]   Theory, research design assumptions, and causal inferences [J].
Armstrong, Christopher S. ;
Kepler, John D. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2018, 66 (2-3) :366-373
[7]   Success or Waste of Taxpayer Money? Impact Assessment of Rural Development Programs in Hungary [J].
Bakucs, Zoltan ;
Ferto, Imre ;
Benedek, Zsofia .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (07)
[8]   Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research [J].
Bascle, Guilhem .
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2008, 6 (03) :285-327
[9]   Extension theory and practice: a review [J].
Black, AW .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2000, 40 (04) :493-502
[10]   The Effect of Employment while in High School on Educational Attainment: A Conditional Difference-in-Differences Approach [J].
Buscha, Franz ;
Maurel, Arnaud ;
Page, Lionel ;
Speckesser, Stefan .
OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2012, 74 (03) :380-396