Functional Realignment of Frontoparietal Subnetworks during Divergent Creative Thinking

被引:36
作者
Beaty, Roger E. [1 ]
Cortes, Robert A. [2 ]
Zeitlen, Daniel C. [1 ]
Weinberger, Adam B. [2 ,3 ]
Green, Adam E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16801 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Dept Psychol, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Ctr Neuroaesthet, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
creativity; default network; divergent thinking; frontoparietal control network; functional connectivity; BRAINS DEFAULT NETWORK; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SEMANTIC DISTANCE; COGNITIVE CONTROL; MOTION ARTIFACT; CONNECTIVITY; ROBUST; SEGMENTATION; REGISTRATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1093/cercor/bhab100
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Creative cognition has been consistently associated with functional connectivity between frontoparietal control and default networks. However, recent research identified distinct connectivity dynamics for subnetworks within the larger frontoparietal system-one subnetwork (FPCNa) shows positive coupling with the default network and another subnetwork (FPCNb) shows negative default coupling-raising questions about how these networks interact during creative cognition. Here we examine frontoparietal subnetwork functional connectivity in a large sample of participants (n=171) who completed a divergent creative thinking task and a resting-state scan during fMRI. We replicated recent findings on functional connectivity of frontoparietal subnetworks at rest: FPCNa positively correlated with the default network and FPCNb negatively correlated with the default network. Critically, we found that divergent thinking evoked functional connectivity between both frontoparietal subnetworks and the default network, but in different ways. Using community detection, we found that FPCNa regions showed greater co-assignment to a default network community. However, FPCNb showed overall stronger functional connectivity with the default network-reflecting a reversal of negative connectivity at rest-and the strength of FPCNb-default network connectivity correlated with individual creative ability. These findings provide novel evidence of a behavioral benefit to the cooperation of typically anticorrelated brain networks.
引用
收藏
页码:4464 / 4476
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Intrinsic defaultexecutive coupling of the creative aging brain [J].
Adnan, Areeba ;
Beaty, Roger ;
Lam, Jaeger ;
Spreng, R. Nathan ;
Turner, Gary R. .
SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 14 (03) :291-303
[2]   Creative aging: functional brain networks associated with divergent thinking in older and younger adults [J].
Adnan, Areeba ;
Beaty, Roger ;
Silvia, Paul ;
Spreng, R. Nathan ;
Turner, Gary R. .
NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2019, 75 :150-158
[4]   The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance [J].
Andrews-Hanna, Jessica R. ;
Smallwood, Jonathan ;
Spreng, R. Nathan .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 1316 :29-52
[5]   The Brain's Default Network and Its Adaptive Role in Internal Mentation [J].
Andrews-Hanna, Jessica R. .
NEUROSCIENTIST, 2012, 18 (03) :251-270
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1967, NATURE HUMAN INTELLI
[7]   The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease [J].
Anticevic, Alan ;
Cole, Michael W. ;
Murray, John D. ;
Corlett, Philip R. ;
Wang, Xiao-Jing ;
Krystal, John H. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (12) :584-592
[8]   Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain [J].
Avants, B. B. ;
Epstein, C. L. ;
Grossman, M. ;
Gee, J. C. .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2008, 12 (01) :26-41
[9]   Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance [J].
Beaty, Roger E. ;
Johnson, Dan R. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2021, 53 (02) :757-780
[10]   Network neuroscience of creative cognition: mapping cognitive mechanisms and individual differences in the creative brain [J].
Beaty, Roger E. ;
Seli, Paul ;
Schacter, Daniel L. .
CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2019, 27 :22-30